Skip to main content

Britain 1, Russia 2 in Junior European Gymnastics Championships


Sergei Eltcov, Kirill Potapov, Artur Dalolyan, Nikita Nagorny, Valentin Starikov

It was a close-ish competition, but Britain came out on top everywhere as a team, except for pommel horse where the British had a bad day, and rings, a strong piece for a Russia.  In truth, they are two brilliant teams.  Many of these gymnasts will turn senior next year, swelling the ranks of their respective teams.  I can't wait to see them fight for medals at the a Rio Olympics.  Coached by two Russians (Andrei Popov and Sergei Sizhanov from the historic gymnastics city of a Vladimir), the British team carries the classical mark of the Russian school.

CORRECTION - The British Junior team head coach is now Barry Collie.  





















Comments

  1. Thanks for the info, I know nothing about the Russian Junior Men team, so it's nice to get info on them

    ReplyDelete
  2. It was sad that the best junior parallel bars worker, Ivan Stretovich, was not there. I believe that had he been there Russia would have had a better chance of defeating the GB team.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No they wouldn't. GB never lost the lead through any rotation. They fell twice off of pommel, a very strong event for them generally. Yet even deducting the two points for falls, they still came out 1.7 ahead of Russia. That would've almost been four points if not for the falls! They are the clear dominant federation in Europe for men's gymnastics; it is their fourth consecutive junior title after all. The Russians will have another chance to put up a better fight among the seniors and in the jr all around.

      But France won the day for best dressed. I hate GB's leo, but France looked very sharp on the podium, very sharp indeed.

      Delete
    2. I wonder the MAG Russia senior is better, isn´t it? Or WAG is better (not considerating this young team without the injuries gymnasts: Komova, Grishna....

      Delete
    3. I think GB seniors are better. They are the Olympic bronze medalists and today they just qualified three points ahead of Russia despite top Ukrainians moving to the Russian team. However I don't think that this Euro's team is Russia's full strength. Two of their best gymnasts are injured i recall. I would say that in terms of weaknesses and strengths both teams are quite equal: lately Russia overtakes Britain on three events, and Britain outscores them on three events. I think that GB just has better, consistent all arounders so they contribute something extra to their team over Russia's weaker AA'ers.

      And yes, Russia's WAG is better than GB.

      Delete
  3. If the Rodionenkos leave the national team is there a possibility for these two coaches to comeback to Russia or they already made their lives in England?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Congratulations to the young Russian men! (and to Team GB of course.:))

    ReplyDelete
  5. Not sure that Popov and Sikhanov would want to move back. Popov moved to the UK with his wife and son in 1991 and his daughter was born there. He initially coached in schools and clubs. However, in 2004 he spotted that British Gymnastics were advertising for a head coach and sent in his resume without really expecting to be successful. The rest is history. I'm not sure when Sikhanov moved to the UK but he's been coaching there since at least 2002. I'm not certain whether he has the same family ties that Popov has so he might be more ameniable to an approach. However, could Russia compete in terms of salary, funding for the gymnastics program, technological and medical support, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is an example of the technology which Popov and Sizhanov are able to access in collaboration with the scientists at Loughborough University which is the UK's leading sports and sports science university.

    www.lboro.ac.uk/staff/news/articles/2012/Oct_Fred-Yeadon-RussianTV.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review of Russian WAG at the 2014 World Championships

The Russians during a team talk in training for the World Championships.  Courtesy RGF Bronze all the way for Russia then.  Beyond the euphoria and surprise of this morning's competition there doesn't really seem to be much to write home about. I am delighted for Aliya personally that the efforts she has made to help the team have provided her with some tangible result, but the principal feeling at the end of the competition is that of relief.  As Vaitsekhovskaya said in her article last week, there were no moments of shock and awe from the Russians, and that's what will be needed if they are to compete for gold medals in Rio (translation available here ). Let's consider a timeline of the competition : before, during and after. BEFORE The promise of a return to the Worlds stage by Viktoria Komova gave Russia a feeling of optimism pre-Russia Cup.  However, Viktoria's performance at this important competition gave little reason for celebration.  Ye

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

Why on earth do I keep this blog?

I had to ask myself this question, this morning, after receiving a pretty nasty comment on my post about yesterday's floor final.  I usually make it a rule not to publish rude, poorly argued, unpleasant or profane comments; I went against that principle.  I trust that whoever 'wrote' that comment is highly embarrassed.  I can't imagine that she or he would speak like that to anyone in person. It is an unfortunate fact of life that the wider internet - social media - encourages the covert, cowardly bullying that is often disguised as argument and opinion on the various gym forums.  Some of the people posting there just don't know how to regulate their behaviour, and moderation can only work retrospectively.  I wish people would think before they post ... would YOU like to read something so rude?  Disagreements are allowed, and you don't have to like someone's writing style, but good manners cost nothing and are at the heart of a civilised society.  

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more