Skip to main content

Grebyonkin on Mustafina, beam and those appeals ... Lupita translates

Evgeny Grebyonkin and Aliya Mustafina.  Courtesy RGF



Yevgeny Grebyonkin, head coach of the women’s gymnastics teams, gave an interview to Sovetski Sport about the thriller that took place today after Aliya Mustafina’s performance who became World Champion.

Two inquiries were submitted at the same time by the Russian delegation and by the USA. Russia tried to challenge Mustafina’score, whose D score was downgraded for some unclear reason. The Americans challenged Ross’ score.

'Our inquiry was taken, although the score was not changed.  Yet Ross’score was changed.  Why was it so?  I don’t know.  Nobody explained anything to us.  Generally they don’t explain anything, they take the inquiry, and if they agree on the complaint, it is posted on the board.  We didn’t see any changes in Mustafina’s score.'

It didn’t have any consequences, because Iordache, the favourite, fell off beam.  If Iordache had not fallen and had performed at her level, Aliya would not have won gold? 

'Yes, unfortunately.'

Why was the Japanese inquiry at the Olympics accepted?  Uchimura had fallen off pommel horse. Aliya didn’t fall, but our inquiry is not accepted.  Is it possible to do something to fight against those double standards?

'The Japanese inquiry was taken because a member of the committee was Japanese. No member is Russian. I don’t know what can be done. I am a coach.'


'We knew that the Romanian Iordache is very strong; she is very dangerous, as well as one of the Chinese girls. This is why we targeted a bronze medal, considering it would be a success. But on beam any forecast may vanish at any moment.  I used to say that the beam is like a checkpoint.  You never know if you will be allowed to pass or not.'

Coming back to the inquiry: how could the judges downgrade the D score?

'Aliya has a very good routine created for her by Raisa Ganina. Yet, after Worlds, we will go over it and modify it because some connections can be interpreted in different ways, giving different scores! The routine should be modified in order to prevent those differences. We’ll work for that!'


Ed's note : Speaking elsewhere, Head Coach Andrei Rodionenko has announced his intention to speak to the FIG about the standards of judging at this competition, and in particular to query the consideration of appeals raised in this final.

Comments

  1. This Championship was a disastrous concerning the judging. Overscoring the Americans everywhere and underscoring everybody else… Not only FIG didn’t learn anything from what happened last summer in London but they also came up with “Gymnastically incorrect” judges this year.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The italians were beautiful on beam but they preferred Biles with major breaks and step on landing...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were beautiful, but I think Ferlito had too much arm-swinging on all her moves. I think they are deducting more for that in the new code? Ferrari missed a connection I think which lowered her D score even more behind Biles and Ferrari's dismount was pretty bad, offline of the beam and a huge step back. I think if Iordache or Rodionova had stayed on the beam either one would have been a better choice for medalist vs. Biles or the Italians.

      Biles did have the 5th best E score out of the 8 finalists and that is counting two who fell, so she was near the bottom of the ranks in E score execution. It was her D score that got her the bronze, and whatever the petition jury saw vs. what the D score judges saw was the difference. The FIG should have to release their decision public so we all know why they accept or reject petitions rather than having it a mystery.

      Delete
    2. I agree that there is a bias towards the Americans, if you remember Aly Raisman (USA) nudging Catalina Ponor of Romania out of Bronze position in London Olympic's Beam Final because of an inquiry when Bela Karolyi literally jumps off the stands and shouted to the coaches to run and put it in, it was devastating to Catalina too as it was for Ferrari here.

      And let's not forget that Vanessa lost a tie-breaker to Aliya Mustafina in the Floor Finals at the Olympics (even though this had nothing to do with an inquiry but about execution score) this brought back sadness and a bit of angry, so I can understand her initial reaction towards Aliya after the final scores were announced and everyone congratulated each other..Ferrari can be seen just shaking hands with Mustafina then proceeds to give everyone else hugs & kisses.

      I am totally for having these decisions disclosed to the public or at least give the inquirer an explanation as to why it was rejected/accepted. I feel had Larisa hit her routine as she flawlessly done so in the passed (she only faltered in EF & AA) her 6.3 D-Score could have blown everyone out. As for Anna Rodionova (love her style btw, reminds me of Komova) she had the potential to medal, at least take Bronze. Everyone had to redo their beam work to adjust to the new code, not sure if the Italians redid theirs, that arm-swing is something to consider but its pretty hard for the gymnasts to avoid it completely. Was it my imagination or did Biles not almost ram her head on the beam or make contact with the beam at dismount? I don't see were they found an extra D-Score points (btw that is the only part that is allowed to be challenged).

      Well I am very delighted that Aliya finally got her Beam Gold Medal, she now possesses a Full set of World Medals, if you recall 2010 she fell and ended last place, Anna having the same results, and it being their first Worlds seems very ironic to me. Hopefully this means Anna can look forward to getting a medal next year (fingers crossed, lol).

      Delete
    3. I also feel that Biles was a bit overscored in beam finals. Her dismount was worse than Ferrari's because although both took large 0.3 steps, Biles also landed with her chest extremely low (which would incur a 0.3 deduction as well). I was a little bit annoyed about the inquiries during the beam final and the fact that Aliya's was rejected while Biles' and Ross' were accepted. I think the 0.2 increase in Biles' D-Score came in her switch leap- switch 1/2- tuck back combo (a series worth 0.3 in bonus). Probably, the judges felt she didn't connect the switch 1/2 to tuck back fast enough and only gave her the switch leap- switch 1/2 combo (0.1 bonus), while the petition jury felt she connected all 3 skills and thus gave her the additional 0.2 to her difficulty. I wonder if Ferrari or Ferlito had submitted inquiries whether they could have gained additional tenths of difficulty and passed Biles. Fortunately, Ross' D-Score, however, was only raised by 0.1 because if it had been raised by 0.2, then she would have beat out Mustafina for gold. Now that would have been annoying!!!! Well, I'm overjoyed that Mustafina finally got the one world championship medal she was missing!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. As a reminder, Biles was deducted heavily on her E score (8.383) so I think the judges correctly deducted for her poor landing (chest too low, .3 step forward, and landing too close to the beam), plus I believe she was ducted for her balance checks on the beam. Ferrari had a cleaner routine on the beam with fewer balance checks but missed a connection and it was an obvious miss so she had to do the move as a solo move; also remember as you mentioned she had a .3 step back on landing which was actually wide enough that it may have been deducted more than .3, plus her landing was way offline of the beam which is another deduction, yet Ferrari scored 8.600 E score because she was cleaner on the beam. With the new scoring system you have to include the D and E scores, which means sometimes the cleaner less difficult, but more pleasing to watch routine falls short. :(

      Is is a shame Iodache and Ridionova fell. I would have preferred either of them winning a medal. Ross and Mustafina certainly were worthy, but I don't think Biles was. But that is gymnastics, falls happen. :(

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Svetlana Boginskaya: I was always a bitch* in gymnastics

Svetlana Boginskaya, 15 years old, with her medals from the Seoul Olympics Nico translates the latest interview with gymnastics legend Svetlana Boginskaya, during a recent visit to her home country of Belarus. Svetlana Boginskaya: I was always a bitch* in gymnastics, so now I ask for forgiveness from everyone who came in contact with me. The National Olympic Committee of Belarus held a press conference with three-time Olympic Champion in artistic gymnastics, Svetlana Boginskaya. The meeting was devoted to the 25th anniversary of the Olympic Games in Seoul. In South Korea the Belarussian won two gold medals in the team competition and vault. As a gift to the Olympic Hall of fame, the famous gymnast, now living in the United States, donated one of her trophies that she won at the 1990 European Championships and a pennant for Best Female Athlete of the USSR in 1989. How happy we were when we could share with such stars as Boginskaya, Scherbo, and Ivankov,...

Mustafina Interview 2 of 2 : 'I will only perform under the Russian flag'

Argumentyi i Fakti interview with Aliya Mustafina Translated by Marina Vulis ‘I have no fear’, says Aliya Mustafina.   ‘My father [Farhat Mustafin, the bronze medallist in Greco-Roman wrestling at the 1976 Olympics] took me to my first gymnastics class.   In his opinion children need to do sports, and he saw gymnastics as useful for my general development.   He had no goals – just to let us practice.’ It did not end with ‘just practice’ – she became the World Champion at 16, but then had an ACL injury the next year (2011) at the Europeans.   Even just returning to gymnastics is a feat; then she came back to win four medals at the 2012 Olympics. Aliya Mustafina – That injury.   I do not know why I was ashamed – so many people were watching me and I could not even walk.   My parents!   They saw everything on TV (the coach had to carry her from the podium).   Of course I was aware that anything could happen in gymnastics, but I di...

Fact or fiction? The press, gymnastics and pregnancy doping

It was a Sunday morning.  I was drinking my coffee and contemplating the day ahead - a workout at the gym, shopping for groceries, an evening reading a book, or catching up on last night's episodes of crime thriller The Bridge .  How nice it was not to have to think about work for a day. Then I saw it - a story about the history of doping in The Observer .  Interesting reading. Of course, cheating is as old as the hills.  It is, unfortunately, human nature for some people to try to gain easy advantage in any kind of competition.  That is why we have laws, rules, ethical guidelines.  People who cheat should face justice and shouldn't complain when they are found out. But the story about pregnancy doping bothered me.  Hadn't that been found to be fictional?  The author began with Olga Kovalenko's allegations made in 1994 - but the rumours had started way back in 1991 with the documentary series More Than A Game .  The practice...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more