Skip to main content

Grebyonkin on Mustafina, beam and those appeals ... Lupita translates

Evgeny Grebyonkin and Aliya Mustafina.  Courtesy RGF



Yevgeny Grebyonkin, head coach of the women’s gymnastics teams, gave an interview to Sovetski Sport about the thriller that took place today after Aliya Mustafina’s performance who became World Champion.

Two inquiries were submitted at the same time by the Russian delegation and by the USA. Russia tried to challenge Mustafina’score, whose D score was downgraded for some unclear reason. The Americans challenged Ross’ score.

'Our inquiry was taken, although the score was not changed.  Yet Ross’score was changed.  Why was it so?  I don’t know.  Nobody explained anything to us.  Generally they don’t explain anything, they take the inquiry, and if they agree on the complaint, it is posted on the board.  We didn’t see any changes in Mustafina’s score.'

It didn’t have any consequences, because Iordache, the favourite, fell off beam.  If Iordache had not fallen and had performed at her level, Aliya would not have won gold? 

'Yes, unfortunately.'

Why was the Japanese inquiry at the Olympics accepted?  Uchimura had fallen off pommel horse. Aliya didn’t fall, but our inquiry is not accepted.  Is it possible to do something to fight against those double standards?

'The Japanese inquiry was taken because a member of the committee was Japanese. No member is Russian. I don’t know what can be done. I am a coach.'


'We knew that the Romanian Iordache is very strong; she is very dangerous, as well as one of the Chinese girls. This is why we targeted a bronze medal, considering it would be a success. But on beam any forecast may vanish at any moment.  I used to say that the beam is like a checkpoint.  You never know if you will be allowed to pass or not.'

Coming back to the inquiry: how could the judges downgrade the D score?

'Aliya has a very good routine created for her by Raisa Ganina. Yet, after Worlds, we will go over it and modify it because some connections can be interpreted in different ways, giving different scores! The routine should be modified in order to prevent those differences. We’ll work for that!'


Ed's note : Speaking elsewhere, Head Coach Andrei Rodionenko has announced his intention to speak to the FIG about the standards of judging at this competition, and in particular to query the consideration of appeals raised in this final.

Comments

  1. This Championship was a disastrous concerning the judging. Overscoring the Americans everywhere and underscoring everybody else… Not only FIG didn’t learn anything from what happened last summer in London but they also came up with “Gymnastically incorrect” judges this year.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The italians were beautiful on beam but they preferred Biles with major breaks and step on landing...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They were beautiful, but I think Ferlito had too much arm-swinging on all her moves. I think they are deducting more for that in the new code? Ferrari missed a connection I think which lowered her D score even more behind Biles and Ferrari's dismount was pretty bad, offline of the beam and a huge step back. I think if Iordache or Rodionova had stayed on the beam either one would have been a better choice for medalist vs. Biles or the Italians.

      Biles did have the 5th best E score out of the 8 finalists and that is counting two who fell, so she was near the bottom of the ranks in E score execution. It was her D score that got her the bronze, and whatever the petition jury saw vs. what the D score judges saw was the difference. The FIG should have to release their decision public so we all know why they accept or reject petitions rather than having it a mystery.

      Delete
    2. I agree that there is a bias towards the Americans, if you remember Aly Raisman (USA) nudging Catalina Ponor of Romania out of Bronze position in London Olympic's Beam Final because of an inquiry when Bela Karolyi literally jumps off the stands and shouted to the coaches to run and put it in, it was devastating to Catalina too as it was for Ferrari here.

      And let's not forget that Vanessa lost a tie-breaker to Aliya Mustafina in the Floor Finals at the Olympics (even though this had nothing to do with an inquiry but about execution score) this brought back sadness and a bit of angry, so I can understand her initial reaction towards Aliya after the final scores were announced and everyone congratulated each other..Ferrari can be seen just shaking hands with Mustafina then proceeds to give everyone else hugs & kisses.

      I am totally for having these decisions disclosed to the public or at least give the inquirer an explanation as to why it was rejected/accepted. I feel had Larisa hit her routine as she flawlessly done so in the passed (she only faltered in EF & AA) her 6.3 D-Score could have blown everyone out. As for Anna Rodionova (love her style btw, reminds me of Komova) she had the potential to medal, at least take Bronze. Everyone had to redo their beam work to adjust to the new code, not sure if the Italians redid theirs, that arm-swing is something to consider but its pretty hard for the gymnasts to avoid it completely. Was it my imagination or did Biles not almost ram her head on the beam or make contact with the beam at dismount? I don't see were they found an extra D-Score points (btw that is the only part that is allowed to be challenged).

      Well I am very delighted that Aliya finally got her Beam Gold Medal, she now possesses a Full set of World Medals, if you recall 2010 she fell and ended last place, Anna having the same results, and it being their first Worlds seems very ironic to me. Hopefully this means Anna can look forward to getting a medal next year (fingers crossed, lol).

      Delete
    3. I also feel that Biles was a bit overscored in beam finals. Her dismount was worse than Ferrari's because although both took large 0.3 steps, Biles also landed with her chest extremely low (which would incur a 0.3 deduction as well). I was a little bit annoyed about the inquiries during the beam final and the fact that Aliya's was rejected while Biles' and Ross' were accepted. I think the 0.2 increase in Biles' D-Score came in her switch leap- switch 1/2- tuck back combo (a series worth 0.3 in bonus). Probably, the judges felt she didn't connect the switch 1/2 to tuck back fast enough and only gave her the switch leap- switch 1/2 combo (0.1 bonus), while the petition jury felt she connected all 3 skills and thus gave her the additional 0.2 to her difficulty. I wonder if Ferrari or Ferlito had submitted inquiries whether they could have gained additional tenths of difficulty and passed Biles. Fortunately, Ross' D-Score, however, was only raised by 0.1 because if it had been raised by 0.2, then she would have beat out Mustafina for gold. Now that would have been annoying!!!! Well, I'm overjoyed that Mustafina finally got the one world championship medal she was missing!!!!!!!

      Delete
    4. As a reminder, Biles was deducted heavily on her E score (8.383) so I think the judges correctly deducted for her poor landing (chest too low, .3 step forward, and landing too close to the beam), plus I believe she was ducted for her balance checks on the beam. Ferrari had a cleaner routine on the beam with fewer balance checks but missed a connection and it was an obvious miss so she had to do the move as a solo move; also remember as you mentioned she had a .3 step back on landing which was actually wide enough that it may have been deducted more than .3, plus her landing was way offline of the beam which is another deduction, yet Ferrari scored 8.600 E score because she was cleaner on the beam. With the new scoring system you have to include the D and E scores, which means sometimes the cleaner less difficult, but more pleasing to watch routine falls short. :(

      Is is a shame Iodache and Ridionova fell. I would have preferred either of them winning a medal. Ross and Mustafina certainly were worthy, but I don't think Biles was. But that is gymnastics, falls happen. :(

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

Komova should have won!

It was a very tight battle in the North Greenwich arena today, with American Gabby Douglas beating out Viktoria Komova by a mere 0.259 points (see results below) and the legendary Aliya Mustafina sealing her comeback from that career-threatening injury with a well deserved bronze medal. Yes, she suffered a fall from beam after her Arabian somersault but elsewhere she was at her best, a real endorsement of the work of the Russian coaches in nursing her back to almost-top form since that fateful day in 2011. Komova had a faultless competition apart from a step on landing her Amanar vault. Frankly, she must feel utterly shattered after coming second once again by a very small margin to an American who was treated very generously by the judges. Komova soared and took every beam move to the max, rounding off with her rare double Arabian dismount in fine style; Douglas literally sidled along the beam, seeming frightened to take her feet off the apparatus for all but her somersaults. Kom

Britain 1, Russia 2 in Junior European Gymnastics Championships

Sergei Eltcov, Kirill Potapov, Artur Dalolyan, Nikita Nagorny, Valentin Starikov It was a close-ish competition, but Britain came out on top everywhere as a team, except for pommel horse where the British had a bad day, and rings, a strong piece for a Russia.  In truth, they are two brilliant teams.  Many of these gymnasts will turn senior next year, swelling the ranks of their respective teams.  I can't wait to see them fight for medals at the a Rio Olympics.  Coached by two Russians (Andrei Popov and Sergei Sizhanov from the historic gymnastics city of a Vladimir), the British team carries the classical mark of the Russian school. CORRECTION - The British Junior team head coach is now Barry Collie.  

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more