Skip to main content

What doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger – WAG Europeans 2012

A surprisingly happy team at Brussels ... Anastasia Sidorova, Maria Paseka, Viktoria Komova, Aliya Mustafina, Anastasia Grishina


Of course, the main story of this week’s WAG European Championships has been the resurgence of the Romanian team as a dominant force in world gymnastics.  Of the five gold medals available here, Romania took four.   Three out of their five gymnasts have gone home with individual gold medals, and the team underlined their strength on beam and floor where they also took silver.  The only apparatus on which they did not excel was bars, Russia’s particular eyrie of the past few years, where we even had a flashback moment with a clean sweep from the republics of the former Soviet Union (Russia, Russia, Ukraine).   

With China and the USA on a similar level,  the FIG will have some worrying moments in London if they want to give the impression that the sport has a wider geographical spread of excellence than in former years. Only Germany, Switzerland, Ukraine and Britain made their way onto the podium at all, with the minor individual medals shared by four gymnasts.   This was the least diverse championships of many years in terms of the distribution of wins. 

For Russia these Championships could not exactly be called an outstanding success, but the fascination for me lies in the way in which the team used a major international tournament as a way of tempering the competitive steel of their unusual mix of talent, experience and youth.  Of the five members of the team, three (Paseka, Sidorova, Grishina) were making their debut at senior international level in a major championships.  There was one past all around world champion (Mustafina) and another vice world champion (Komova).    Two (Sidorova, Paseka) have not been seen in senior international competition at all barring a couple of minor events.   Three (Komova, Mustafina, Sidorova) were coming back from serious injuries.    Two world champions (Afanasyeva, Nabieva) were left at home.    It would be difficult to find a more aspiring, less predictable team in world gymnastics.

The medal count was probably not what the Russians had expected, although one expects that the results they did achieve will be less important in the long run than the learning acquired, physical, mental and emotional.  If the Russians’ point was to give their young, inexperienced hands a taste of the vagaries of tough international competition, they succeeded handsomely.   Starting on beam during the qualification round could be planned for, but what could not be predicted was the death sequence of three meltdowns on floor.  The team’s muted response on vault was followed by the shock of Mustafina’s poor performance on bars.  Qualifications must have left the team feeling utterly drained, and Mustafina questioning whether her world champion form had deserted her forever.  First dip in the Europeans roller coaster.

The team then found themselves with a beam start once more in finals, and in a deficit position before they had hardly begun when first up, young Sidorova hopped off the apparatus.  In the end, this small slip cost the team a gold medal that might have transformed the whole feel of the competition.     The Russians pulled together an acceptable floor round, but it was only after vault that the old energy returned and Mustafina finally began to smile again.  Finishing with three magnificent bars sets might have given the Russians the edge, but the strength of the Romanians on vault, beam and floor proved enough to overhaul an unbalanced team performance.  The rollercoaster ride never really reached its peak, and the Russian girls will have to wait a little longer and pull a little harder next time round if they want a more satisfying end.

This team selection was an intriguing strategy for the Russian coaches to pursue, if it was a choice at all, and the conduct of the competition itself was far from usual. This was the first major international at which I have observed Alexandrov take no visible role on the floor.   His absence forced gymnasts to take responsibility for their performances, with Mustafina and Grishina emerging as moral leaders.  Fledgling gymnasts were required to learn to fly at all costs.  Or, were they working with their daily coaches on a learning journey that was as vital as anything going on in the gym back home in Moscow?  

Perhaps Alexandrov simply decided to make a virtue out of necessity: with Afanasyeva and Nabieva out of the picture, he had to try out young blood.  A couple of lightly injured veterans also provided a convenient route to damage limitation.  More was demanded of the gymnasts than taking home an empty gold, silver or worse.  The outcome includes rival team PR machines and the gymternet left in a state of perpetual questioning that will be impossible to answer until it’s all too late.  The results do not show the weight of what the Russians learned here.  Much was gained that was not made of metal.

If I had to say something helpful to the team, it would be: what doesn’t kill you, makes you stronger.

More will follow soon on both junior and senior competitions, and you can find a photograph album of Elena Mikhailova's lovely photographs, courtesy of the RGF, on RRG's Facebook page.







Comments

  1. Do you have any interviews of Alexandrov or the gymnasts about the disaster in Brussels? It would be interesting to see what he thinks of the poor performances of his girls. With only 2 month to go, there is not enough time to fix the many mistakes they had.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As soon as I find any more information, I will post links.

    I agree that it is late to change things. In my opinion this is why this competition was essentially used as a training ground ... so many injuries to overcome, so many fledgling gymnasts to make ready for competition.

    Alexandrov has said as much.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent post, as usual! I thought Mustafina's bar routine in the team comp was one of the highlights of the entire competition, and Grishina's overall strong performance another cause for celebration.

    Overall, I think it wasn't a bad idea to send a more "experimental" team to Euros. I think you're right in saying that necessity dictated testing some newcomers, and I'd rather see Russia do it at Euros than in London! Obviously the medal haul was not enormous (and Komova's continued unsteadiness on beam is, for me, cause for even greater concern than Mustafina's miss on bars and floor during the quals) but the competitive experience is priceless, really.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have a feeling Russia was also scoping out team Romania in terms of scoring potential. The Romanians have now shown more or less their actual programs and d-scores and I doubt any significant drastic changes will be made on most of their routines. Possible additions include Amanars from VT (so a potential +2.1 increase in VT), some minor upgrades in UB, some upgrades in BB and FX perhaps totaling an additional 1-2 pts max on those apparatus.

    Russia thus far has only shown their actual Olys TF-worthy UB. VT/BB and FX remains indefinite.

    Maybe I am just reaching for something, but I hope that this is really part of their masterplan and that it doesn't backfire on the Russians :D

    ReplyDelete
  5. 'disaster' in Brussels? 'too many mistakes' to fix? I'm sorry, have we seen the same competition? Recall Liukin still falling on floor during 2008 Visa and Patterson having so called meltdown in the Olympic team competition. Mustafina's grip got caught on the bar in the quals and her floor has been trained for less than two months. Call it a day off, call it whatever. She herself forgot about the whole thing as soon as it was over posting 'forgotten. the day after tomorrow, all starts from scratch'. And boy, did it.. that stuck DTY and the highest score of the meet speak for themselves. Vika is not even trying to pay attention to what everybody's saying, she knows where she's at and she's a champion. Nastia not yet in full difficulty and Ksenka back home ready to be as big a 'surprise' as she was in Tokyo. Only God knows how hard Anya works and she is a European champion. To you, girls only 'seem' to be this and that, but after Nastia Liukin no one should ever doubt about how much can be done in a space of a few months. They ARE champions, and there is no messing with that. Go Russia!

    ReplyDelete
  6. @21:27 I hope you are right cause I want them to win, but I am worried.
    I found this interview of Rodionenko http://www.allsportinfo.ru/index.php?id=59922. It would be great if you could translate. Is he saying the girls will have 5 days off. OMG, the Romanian, who are miles away start training immediately and the Russian who have so much to improve, have a break? I hope they know what they are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This one also http://www.newizv.ru/sport/2012-05-15/163411-sil-hvatilo-na-serebro.html
    The google translation is not that good.

    ReplyDelete
  8. -Originally we were planning on using this competition to help us choose the squad. What we have seen is not really optimal. there are two spots left and a lot of contenders. We have been chossing since the Russian Championships, now during the Euros and there is still the Russian Cup in June. There the olympic squad and program will be decided, we're not yet ready.
    -But Romania who beat us is all ready?
    - Yes, they proved it.
    -Their Olympic program is done?
    -It is. Their leaders recovered from injuries faster, with us- medicine has put us behind.
    then he names Aliya, Vikuska and Nastya as the three Olympians and says their not in full form yet
    then he beautifully avoids the question about Vika's bars not showing any more difficulty by saying, Vik needs to compete on 4 apparatus, so far she's showing 50%
    then he talks about Ksenka's cold and how she was laing in bed with high fever. he hopes she's fine now
    then he says that the girls have five days of 'восстановления' which is basically gymnastic rest- only some light conditioning and training, before three intense weeks at the base (in prep. for the Russian Cup)
    don't jump into conclusion that they are wasting 5 days, two of the girls are a high injury risk, Ksenka's just coming back from an ilness and body simply needs to have a breather after an intense competition. to the outside it seems like there is a lot of worry in the camp, but peoplpe need to understand that this is the Russian way; no intention of uncovering their cards until necessary and no bragging whatsoever. the girls need to be the ones 'chasing' not 'being chased'- that is a great advantage in gymnastics.

    ReplyDelete
  9. in the other interview Rodionenko repeats that due to injuries they fell behind in comparison to others, he says that Brussels was an important information about the candidates fighting for the last two spots. Vik y Aliya will carry the heaviest burden of expectations for medals and Alexandrov reminds about the importance of having an Amanar. I say it once more- we talk about World Champions, they're smart. It's not the time to worry, it's time to scream Go Russia! and I shall.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The team I would like to see in London would probably be;
    -Mustafina
    -Komova
    -Grishina
    -Afanasyeva
    -Dementyeva

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thank you all for links and translations ... will give these greater consideration in the coming days.

    Hmm ... not sure Dementyeva fits the team line up even on her top form, unless the unthinkable happens. If, as she says, Afanasyeva can help the team on beam and floor, what the coaches are really looking for is a good vault and bars worker, with the emphasis on vault given the team's overall strength on bars.

    So for me, it's between Sidorova and Paseka for the final slot, depending on who can perfect the two and a half twisting Yurchenko ...

    ReplyDelete
  12. Thank you very much for the translations!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Interesting interview http://www.championat.com/olympic12/article-123658-aleksandrov-rezultat-udovletvoritelnyj.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Vladimir Zaglada - coach, author, friend, father

It is with great sadness that I report here the sudden and completely unexpected death, on 5th October, of our friend Vladimir Zaglada.  I send my love and condolences to his daughter, Olesya.  My thoughts are with the whole family.   Vladimir was born in Lvov, Ukraine, in November 1944.  His father was a progressive lawyer of great courage who was known to defend those who challenged the Soviet authorities.  Vladimir trained as a sports acrobat under the developing Soviet sports system, working in the same club as Olympic champion Viktor Chukarin.  After moving to Moscow, he became a leading coach of women's gymnastics, supporting the development of high level acrobatics.  He worked particularly closely with the up and coming young gymnasts of the early 1980s - you can see him at work in the video 'You in Gymnastics'.  At the national training centre, Lake Krugloye, he worked with Filatova, Mostepanova, Yurchenko, Arzhannikova, Mukhina and more.   Around the mid 1980s Vlad

Komova should have won!

It was a very tight battle in the North Greenwich arena today, with American Gabby Douglas beating out Viktoria Komova by a mere 0.259 points (see results below) and the legendary Aliya Mustafina sealing her comeback from that career-threatening injury with a well deserved bronze medal. Yes, she suffered a fall from beam after her Arabian somersault but elsewhere she was at her best, a real endorsement of the work of the Russian coaches in nursing her back to almost-top form since that fateful day in 2011. Komova had a faultless competition apart from a step on landing her Amanar vault. Frankly, she must feel utterly shattered after coming second once again by a very small margin to an American who was treated very generously by the judges. Komova soared and took every beam move to the max, rounding off with her rare double Arabian dismount in fine style; Douglas literally sidled along the beam, seeming frightened to take her feet off the apparatus for all but her somersaults. Kom

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more