Skip to main content

Tatiana Lyssenko 1993 World Championships - at a turning point of gymnastics

Randomly scanning Youtube for items of interest, I came across this video of 1990 World Cup All Around Champion and 1992 Olympic Beam Champion, Tatiana Lyssenko.



'The beam obeys me' is one of the most memorable quotes by a champion gymnast. Lyssenko pronouced this some years before she won the beam gold medal in Barcelona and performed this rhythmic, well balanced routine at the 1993 World Championships in Birmingham, UK. She went on to take the bronze medal all around in a closely matched competition behind Romania's Gina Gogean and USA's Shannon Miller. She was a remarkable gymnast : as precise and powerful as Podkopayeva but with the spontaneity and line of Omelianchik and a haughty pride that was all her own, Lyssenko is one of the most underrated gymnasts of that time. If only the Ukrainians could produce her like once more.

It was a time of change for gymnastics. Not only had the team of the Soviet Union (well, technically, the hastily assembled Commonwealth of Independent States) competed for the final time at the Olympics the previous year, but also a brand new Code of Points had been installed, drafted for the first time in the English language as its native tongue. For many years the Code had been 'owned' by the Russian language. Rumours have it that the first fully translated version of the Code only reached the various East European camps weeks before the championships began. Under the circumstances, Lyssenko's bronze was probably worthy of a super-gold reward, hampered as it was by an apparent backlash against the dwindling power of the former Eastern bloc nations.

The 1993 World Championships were a dog leg in gymnastics history where a corner was turned towards a more athletic model. The Soviet Union's cultural model of the sport had dominated, more or less, for 40 years. The positive legacy of artistry and great performance is now gradually dimming.

When will we see the next turning point?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

So this is where things stand … Russian gymnasts in Europe

  Croatia has denied visas to nine members of the Russian national gymnastics delegation. Croatia says the applications were refused because insufficient information was provided about the purpose of travel for those nine individuals. Russia disputes this explanation, arguing that more than 60 other gymnasts, coaches and officials received visas after submitting applications containing the same information. Significantly, three of the gymnasts denied visas — Angelina Melnikova, Anna Kalmykova and Viktoria Listunova — could reasonably have been expected to contend for medals in Zagreb. This has inevitably led to allegations that the visa refusals were intended to weaken Russia’s team. At full strength, Russia’s women’s team would have been among the strongest — and quite possibly the strongest — competing at these European Championships. However, there is currently no evidence establishing that the refusals were deliberately designed to influence the sporting outcome. The impor...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more