Skip to main content

Afanasyeva leads Russia Cup All Around qualifications

By
Veteran artistic gymnast Ksenia Afanasyeva leads the first day of Russia Cup competition in Ekaterinburg, ahead of European champion Anna Dementieva and newcomer to the senior team, Viktoria Komova.  This annual competition will form an important element of the selection process for the national team for autumn's World Championships.  Full individual results can be viewed on the Federation's website.

Afanasyeva is said to be the gymnast on top form at this competition, having fully recovered from an injury she had been carrying for some time.  Viktoria Komova performed extremely well considering she was not initially expected to compete on all four pieces, and achieved the highest score on bars.

Only three of last year's World Championships team - Afanasyeva, Dementieva and Semenova - featured in the top ten here (Semenova, recently returned to Lake Krugloye to begin full training, finished in 7th place).  Tatiana Nabieva competed only vault and bars but seems to have had a bad day, recording a disastrous 12.575 on vault (19th) and relatively low 14.775 on bars (5th). 

Newcomer Yulia Belokobylskaya finished in 4th place, showing a consistent contribution throughout the day, while vault and floor specialist Maria Paseka made a credible first call for a place on the worlds team, finishing in 1st place on vault.

The all around final takes place tomorrow at 5.00 pm local time - online streaming video of the competition may be accessible here, trusting that the technology will work.

Russia Cup All Around Qualifications results, 17th August 2011

1     Ksenia Afanasyeva              58.675
2     Anna Dementieva                58.55
3     Viktoria Komova                57.15
4     Yulia Belokobylskaya          56.275
5     Yulia Inishina                       55.25
6     Maria Stepanova                 53.775
7     Ksenia Semenova                53.75
8     Diana Sapronova                 52.925
9     Anna Pavlova                      52.925
10   Ekaterina Kramarenko         52.2
11   Ramila Musina                     50.75
12   Ekaterina Kurbatova            50.125

The event qualifications information provided below is collated using the ordinal numbers provided at the side of each apparatus score.  This has ended up showing some frustrating gaps - I don't fully understand why but perhaps more information will be available in the morning.

 Vault qualifications

1     Maria Paseka                     14.875
2     Anna Pavlova                     14.8
3     Ksenia Afanasyeva             14.6
4     Y. Belokobylskaya             14.5
5     V Komova                         14.05
6     ?
7     E Kramarenko                   13.75
8    K Semenova                       13.60
R    M Stepanova                      13.425
R    Francesca Yanaeva             13.425

Uneven bars qualifications

1   V Komova                        15.8
2   ?
3   A Dementieva                    14.95
4   ?
5   T Nabieva                         14.775
6   K Afanasyeva                    14.2
7   Kramarenko                      13.75
8   Stepanova                          13.65
R   Belokobylskaya                 13.625
R   A Pavlova                          13.225

Beam qualifications

1   A Dementieva                     15.3
2   ?
3  K Afanasyeva                      14.9
4  V Komova                           14.8
5  ?
6  Y Belokobylskaya               14.325
7   D Sapronova                      14.15
8   Y Inishina                           13.825
R  T Solovieva                         13.65
R  K Semenova                       13.575

Floor qualifications

1   K Afanasyeva                    14.975
2   A Dementieva                    14.9
3   ?
4   Y Inishina                           14.375
5   Y Belokobylskaya              14.275
6   M Stepanova                     14.075
7   M Paseka                          13.4
8   K Semenova                      13.225
R   R Musina                           13.125
R   Maria Smirnova                 13.075

I should also record that the team results are available here.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous17 August 2011 at 22:58

    I'm just joking but maybe Mustafina secretly competed here, hence the (?).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Queen Elizabeth18 August 2011 at 00:41

    I never had thought of that. You could very well be right. O:-)

    Or it could be Grishina and another junior.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous18 August 2011 at 01:34

    Grishina sort of makes sense. If you look in the bottom left of this photo, she is definitely there. The scores make sense for her too.

    http://s.66.ru/new66/collection/14/04/e7/5d/1404e75d.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  4. Queen Elizabeth18 August 2011 at 07:45

    If we are right, she could well have been in contention for sikver all around. I'll keep my eye on the results and see what confirmation we can get ...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Head MAG Coach Alfosov on Russian gymnastics prospects in 2026

By
"A Really Good International Level": Alfosov on the Return of Russian Gymnasts, Belyavsky's Videos, and the Games Qualification Alfosov: Belyavsky's presence on the team was a big plus Interview by Elena Vaitsekhovskaya  Google translate Russian gymnasts competing under neutral status will be able to take their first step toward qualifying for the Los Angeles Olympics as early as October, Valery Alfosov, head coach of the Russian men's team, told RT. He believes that qualifying for not only the individual but also the team competition at the World Championships is one of the season's greatest achievements. He also explained the criteria he uses to compare his players with their competitors and described David Belyavsky's decision last year as hard-won. The current season began with good news for the gymnasts: almost all of the leading Russian team members are participating in international competitions. Does this mean the suspension situation is a thing of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who really won the WAG All Around?

By
You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...
70 comments
Read more

Artistry versus acrobatics???

By
Watching videos of this weekend's competitions - the qualification and all around rounds of the Russian championships, medal winners from the American Cup - I am struck, more and more, by the huge difference between the American and Russian schools of gymnastics. It led me to ask the question : do artistry and acrobatics have to be mutually exclusive? (I am afraid that I think naming 'American' gymnastics a 'school' is perhaps lending an undeserved dignity to work which has become excessively obsessed with the difficult and the consistent, but I am using the word here so as not to label unfairly those individual gymnasts who are blameless in the direction of their training.) The FIG's vision for gymnastics is said to embrace more artistry; at least the publicity it has put about on the subject of its new Code makes that fairly plain.  So perhaps the Russians, with their inconsistent brilliance and superior body carriage (Mustafina, Komova, Grishina, Afanasy...
39 comments
Read more

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more