Skip to main content

Grandi, Rodionenko speak in advance of international conference on the future of Russian sports

Bruno Grandi, President of the FIG, will be speaking at an international conference on the future of Russian sports, 'Russia, Country of Sports', to be held at the Russian International Olympic University in Saransk on the 9th September. The conference will be attended by leading practitioners in the field of sports education, including Head Coach of the Russian national gymnastics team, Andrei Rodionenko.

Both Grandi and Rodionenko have given interviews in the approach to this important event which you will be able to find (in Russian) at the Sports Daily website - links provided below. 

Bruno Grandi uses the opportunity to trumpet ongoing efforts to simplify the Code with a view to making the sport more attractive to spectators, and looks forward to the London Olympics. 

Rodionenko echoes some of the themes he identified in so many of his interviews given at around the time of last year's World Championships - principally emphasising the need to reinforce the resource base of the sport at grass roots level.  Making reference to a three-tier system of training (I am guessing here he is referring to the Junior team, the Olympic reserves team and the main national team), he is relatively optimistic about the preparation of a strong Olympic squad for the forthcoming Olympiad up to 2016, and thanks the Russian Gymnastics Federation and the Ministry of Sport, Tourism and Youth Policy for their support. 

Nevertheless, he says, it takes longer than a few years to overcome problems that have accrued over  decades.

There is a lack of qualified gymnastics professionals. The migration of coaches overseas has weakened the gymnastics effort in Russia and standards of coach education at the lowest level often leave something to be desired.  It also remains difficult to pay young coaches enough to encourage them to stay in their jobs.  Given the importance of early training to gymnastics (which is also emphasised in Leonid Arkayev's interview on I-G TV) it is clear that Rodionenko considers these problems to be a major threat to the continuing development of the sport in Russia beyond 2016.

For the sport to thrive, the regions must also play their part in identifying and training new talent.  Rodionenko highlights the strong development of three particular regions:

     -    Siberia and its gymnastics centre in Leninsk-Kuznetsk. (You can find plenty of references to development work taking place in this region on the Russian Gymnastics Federation's website - including records of state visits by Vladimir Putin - it is plain they are a powerhouse, contributing a good number of national team members eg Ignatyev.)
     -    the Southern Federal District and its centre in Rostov-on-Don, formerly home to such greats as Ludmilla Tourischeva and Natalia Yurchenko, today home to national team member and prospective Olympian Anastasia Sidorova
     -   Central Russia and its centre, the Penza School of Gymnastics.

The Urals (Chelyabinsk) and Ekaterinburg (home of this month's Russian Cup) were also mentioned (it is apparently 40 years since the last major competition took place there), but Rodionenko laments the fall of St Petersburg as a centre of gymnastics.   Tatiana Nabieva is the lone representative on the national team of this once proud gymnastics centre.

Rodionenko was not especially ready to be drawn on likely rankings at the forthcoming Tokyo World Championships, explaining that there was likely to be strong competition given its importance as a qualifying competition for the London Olympics.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Why on earth do I keep this blog?

I had to ask myself this question, this morning, after receiving a pretty nasty comment on my post about yesterday's floor final.  I usually make it a rule not to publish rude, poorly argued, unpleasant or profane comments; I went against that principle.  I trust that whoever 'wrote' that comment is highly embarrassed.  I can't imagine that she or he would speak like that to anyone in person. It is an unfortunate fact of life that the wider internet - social media - encourages the covert, cowardly bullying that is often disguised as argument and opinion on the various gym forums.  Some of the people posting there just don't know how to regulate their behaviour, and moderation can only work retrospectively.  I wish people would think before they post ... would YOU like to read something so rude?  Disagreements are allowed, and you don't have to like someone's writing style, but good manners cost nothing and are at the heart of a civilised society. ...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more