Skip to main content

FIG news - letter from President Bruno Grandi 2nd May 2011

Somewhat belatedly, I've been reading President Grandi's latest letter dated 2nd May 2011.

It's difficult to understand why this letter has been presented at this time - what has prompted this?  Why does Grandi suddenly consider it imperative to change a Code which encompassed so many changes he himself initiated?  The letter is wordy and cloaked in flowery declarations, but makes two key points - (i) the Code needs simplification, and, (ii) crucially, he finally acknowledges that objectivity is an inappropriate principle in the judgement of an artistic sport.

Many of us would agree with this, but the letter has received a somewhat muted response in the media - some links are provided below.  Problem is, the Code, competition formats and so on seem to change so regularly it's difficult to keep track, and the changes rarely lead to much, if any, improvement.  Furthermore, Grandi's letters don't really amount to much.   On a practical level, he does not set out a timeframe within which to address these problems.  He provides no action plan.  He doesn't say who will be responsible for nursing any changes through, and who will be consulted. 

I would suggest that this lack of clarity, and our somewhat bewildered response to it, allows Grandi to continue his 'top down' management changes and to exercise an inappropriate degree of control over the sport.   The process of change lacks transparency, and the FIG is not fully answerable for the consequences of any changes made.  Nor does it apparently consult its stakeholders.

Grandi talks of the need to simplify the Code but does not analyse the reasons why it has become so overcomplicated.  Technical experts will refer to the rapid and continuous development of the sport over decades, and of course this is an important point.  Failures to edit the Code thoroughly and manage different versions consistently have also led to serious errors: for example at last year's Worlds, where the Russian coaches were referring to a Quick Guide to the Code which had not been updated, leading them to lose medals. 

Grandi's acknowledgement of the subjective nature of gymnastics' judging also leads me to point to the linguistic and semiotic complexity of sharing a Code even amongst communities who speak the same mother tongue.  Discussions of gymnastics are fraught with ambiguity and contradiction.  The various value-laden assumptions as to the identity of the sport today have not even begun to be articulated.  In a multi-cultural, multi-lingual sporting community, within a complex technical framework that relies on judgement, this is critical.  Quite often we are speaking at cross purposes. 

What do these words mean to you?

Harmonious
Choreography
Performance
Execution
Amplitude
Artistry
Expression
Difficulty

Just a small sample of key concepts important to gymnastics, picked from the air.  I dare bet a significant number of equally valid definitions could be developed for each of them.  Translate them into another language, and you would find another layer of meaning.

Simplifying the Code will never work until we can find a common language that reflects the rich cultural significance of gymnastics, as well as the technicalities of the sport.  One of the first jobs Grandi should task is the development of an internationally agreed, fully representative lexicography of key terms.


Further reading :

Rewriting Russian Gymnastics, 13th October 2010 Can judging ever be objective?
Rewriting Russian Gymnastics, 29th October 2010 Evaluating the artistic: ambiguity and the FIG
Gymnastics Examiner (Blythe Lawrence), 1st May 2011 Bruno Grandi: 'the Code has mutated into a time bomb'
International Gymnastics (Amanda Turner), 1st May 2011 Grandi calls Code of Points 'a time bomb'
Gymnastics Coaching, 1st May 2011 Grandi: Code mutated to a time bomb

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nabiyeva now married, living in Shanghai

Our dear Tatiana Nabiyeva has married!  It appears that she now lives in China.

Tatiana Nabieva - her experiences in China

 Tatyana Nabieva and Maria Paseka spent a year in China, working as coaches for the country's women's national team. We spoke with Tatyana about her experience working with Chinese gymnasts and memories of the trip. ❓ How did the idea to go to China even come about? Was this a long-planned invitation from the Chinese side? 💬 This was a complete surprise for me. I was in Dagestan, I had my plans lined up, but Masha called and asked if I wanted to go to China to work. I enjoy risk, so I answered: “Why not, let’s go!” ❓ You went to training camps in Russia for many years as a gymnast and even as a personal trainer. What was your job in China? 💬 Let me correct you, in Russia I only went to a training camp once as a personal trainer, replacing my coach. And we were invited to China as specialists to work on individual apparatus. We worked with the Chinese women's team in Beijing. ❓ What kind of equipment did you work with and did you have any specific task formulated before st

The sad demise of artistic gymnastics

This picture, of 1985 Soviet World Championships team member Irina Baraksanova, is a symbol of what is now lost to gymnastics as a whole, and Russia in particular.  Black and white, the picture was taken at another time when imagery came at a premium, technology was simple and memory and emotion played an important part in documenting sports history.  A similar picture taken today might be more colourful and have a sharper focus, but lack the nostalgic significance, the scope to challenge the imagination.  For all its lack of precision and technical sophistication, this box brownie snap captures the feeling of a unique moment.  Baraksanova, in common with many of her team mates, used floor exercise to tell an enigmatic and gentle story built on line, air and just a little bit of acrobatic magic.  The position of the head, the asymmetry of the position, the downcast eyes, all speak to me.  She combined grace and power, innovation and tradition to make the extreme difficulty of what sh

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more