Skip to main content

Can judging ever be objective? Part 1

In my usual butterfly manner I am dipping in and out of matters somewhat haphazardly, without looking at individual areas in too much depth. This is partly because I lack concentration at the times I come to write this blog, but also because I tend to like to see a whole picture, even if slightly out of focus, rather than part of a picture in intense focus. Inter-relationships between different phenomena interest me more than single ideas. Also, my passion is for gymnastics and what lies behind its creative and expressive development, rather than a particular set of theories.

Gymnastics is not something I observe coldly from the outside; I live each new and old routine, and my judgement of them comes from within me, and is preceded and shaded by many previous experiences. I am an armchair admirer of the sport; my main gymnastic achievement ever was to execute a forward roll without breaking my neck, and yet my recollection of my ā€˜favouriteā€™ routines is always tinged with emotion and memories that go beyond mere intellectual recollection. This can work in reverse, accidentally and suddenly, as well as when deliberately recalling the detail of a competition. So when I hear a particular piece of music, it can remind me of a floor exercise. Natalia Ilienkoā€™s 1981 floor exercise regularly pops up when I am listening to Classic FM. Swallows diving over a swimming pool in Crete reminded me of Comaneciā€™s graceful Hecht dismount off bars at the Montreal Olympics. Gymnastics trips me up from time to time in my everyday life and appears in places it never should, but it is always a welcome visitor.

So my view of gymnastics is completely subjective and personal. When I see a routine I feel for the grace rather than recognise and evaluate it as something that has particular characteristics. I respond to the large and spectacular and invest performances with emotion. These feelings most probably do not match the way others perceive the routine, and many of the features of the performance that I will enjoy will be intangible. It is the involuntary, unplanned beauty of gymnastics as opposed to the deliberate artistry. The Code of Points tries to quantify both, but fails.

If my perceptions are wholly personal, influenced by a host of personal experiences unique to me, and something that comes from within myself, there must be significant problems involved in using my sensory evidence to assign creative value to work. Yet who is to say that my personal assessment is of more or less value than anotherā€™s? In acknowledging sport as art and accepting gymnastics as a sport within which both the artistic and aesthetic are important, do we not need to acknowledge the critical role of subjective judgement? Can judging ever be objective?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ā€˜My daughter likes gymnastics. For us, this is the big successā€™. Aliya Mustafina talks to Match TV

Via VK.com.  Google translate A big interview with Aliya Mustafina was published on MATCH!. We provide a small excerpt below, and the full version is available on the website at the link below  ā“ Aliya, you are now the head coach of the junior artistic gymnastics team. What does your typical day look like? šŸ’œ My current life is similar to what it was when I was competing. In the morning, I have breakfast and go to work by 9:00, we train for four hours, have lunch, rest and train for another three hours. During the training camp, the athletes live at the base. They live and train on the same territory. ā“ Do you manage the gymnasts' personal trainers or do you evenly distribute the responsibilities? šŸ’œ We work in contact with the personal trainers, I listen to their opinions. For example, if the trainer believes that their athlete needs to be given a little rest or do fewer repetitions of a particular exercise, we do so. ā“ Describe the current generation of children. Do they nee...

Russian Gymnastics Federation withdraws AIN athletes from competition

 An official announcement, via VK.  Google translate. Official statement of the Russian Gymnastics Federation All Russian athletes representing artistic and rhythmic gymnastics, who received "neutral status", decided to refrain from participating in the upcoming competitions under the auspices of the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG). The reason for this decision is the numerous unfounded and biased refusals of the FIG special committee to allow our gymnasts to compete. The Russian Gymnastics Federation respects and shares the position of the athletes. President of the Russian Gymnastics Federation Oleg Belozerov: "I respect the athletes' decision and understand what it is dictated by. At our meeting on March 10, Mr. Watanabe said that "I would like to use all my strength to once again think about the role of sport in this world. Sport should unite and give friendship, it should not be a tool for increasing hatred. The rights of every person must be resp...

The tragic end for Russian gymnastics

  Russian gymnasticsā€™ recent decision to withdraw its neutral athletes from international competition, as a protest over some offence or other, is highly uncharacteristic.   Only a few weeks ago, Russia was welcoming FIG President Watanabe into its gymnastics homes, with smiles and hugs exchanged at the highest level.   The gymnasts, including especially Angelina Melnikova, have been training assiduously for a return to the international arena.   There have been excited announcements of the names of those returning to our world of gymnastics.   Russian gymnastics has always been friendly, international and diplomatic.   Good sportsmanship is required of athletes and is generally shown, with a few notable exceptions.   During the depths of the Cold War, Russiaā€™s teams toured the world, staging friendship displays and offering workshops and training.   Russian officials have been at the heart of the sportā€™s governance since the early 1990s and e...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more