Skip to main content

Bruno Grandi : The Code should encourage aesthetics

By
Nora Schuler has kindly translated part of Bruno Grandi's interview in the most recent issue of Gymnastika.  She reports as follows :

'The most interesting bit is the answer to the last question:

"Q: You thanked our coaches for the return of Soviet gymnastics to the top after the European championships. Why is this so important to you?
A:For a very simple reason: Russia is the founder of today's technical progress [of the sport]. And the FIG cannot afford to lose these traditions – the technical, didactic and pedagogical principles, which are characteristic of your gymnastics.
The Russian gymnastics that we saw at World and European championships in 2010, in particular, from the women, is very beautiful. This is indeed a renaissance. A search for harmony in the unity of the composition (content) of the routine and music. In this sense, Aliya Mustafina (and not only she) showed a return to the values that always belonged to your school. It is mandatory that gymnastics remain artistic and not become similar to sports acrobatics. The rules should encourage the aesthetic part, if we do not want depersonalize our sport."'


Nora adds that the reference to 'depersonalisation' may have lost some of its nuance in translation from Italian to Russian, then Russian to English - the meaning may have more to do with encouraging individuality.

I'm really amazed that he can be so clear in supporting Russia's contribution to the sport, but I wonder what plans he has to change the Code and its implementation to ensure a more holistic approach to marking.  Nora also mentions that

'Regarding the reference judges, he says that they brought them in to control the execution scores on a "mathematical basis". (the Fairbrother system). They need to continue working on minimising subjectivity in judging.'


Subjectivity important to assessing artistry and aesthetics?  I think he must be rather confused ...


BIG THANKS to Nora for taking the time and trouble to do this translation and commentary!

Edited 10.41 am : the Russian Gymnastics Federation has now added an English language translation of parts of the interview at their Website, emphasising Grandi's acknowledgement of Russia as founders of the modern sport.  He also addresses some interesting issues to do with marking and the Code, so it's more than worth a read.  In light of Ludmilla Korolenko's comments about judging, it is clear that the Code is a point of discussion for the Russians at present.

Russian Gymnastics Federation (2010) 'Bruno Grandi: Russian Gymnastics is very beautiful' (Russian language) Gymnastika 2010 issue 4, pp 10-11
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Head MAG Coach Alfosov on Russian gymnastics prospects in 2026

By
"A Really Good International Level": Alfosov on the Return of Russian Gymnasts, Belyavsky's Videos, and the Games Qualification Alfosov: Belyavsky's presence on the team was a big plus Interview by Elena Vaitsekhovskaya  Google translate Russian gymnasts competing under neutral status will be able to take their first step toward qualifying for the Los Angeles Olympics as early as October, Valery Alfosov, head coach of the Russian men's team, told RT. He believes that qualifying for not only the individual but also the team competition at the World Championships is one of the season's greatest achievements. He also explained the criteria he uses to compare his players with their competitors and described David Belyavsky's decision last year as hard-won. The current season began with good news for the gymnasts: almost all of the leading Russian team members are participating in international competitions. Does this mean the suspension situation is a thing of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who really won the WAG All Around?

By
You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...
70 comments
Read more

Artistry versus acrobatics???

By
Watching videos of this weekend's competitions - the qualification and all around rounds of the Russian championships, medal winners from the American Cup - I am struck, more and more, by the huge difference between the American and Russian schools of gymnastics. It led me to ask the question : do artistry and acrobatics have to be mutually exclusive? (I am afraid that I think naming 'American' gymnastics a 'school' is perhaps lending an undeserved dignity to work which has become excessively obsessed with the difficult and the consistent, but I am using the word here so as not to label unfairly those individual gymnasts who are blameless in the direction of their training.) The FIG's vision for gymnastics is said to embrace more artistry; at least the publicity it has put about on the subject of its new Code makes that fairly plain.  So perhaps the Russians, with their inconsistent brilliance and superior body carriage (Mustafina, Komova, Grishina, Afanasy...
39 comments
Read more

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more