Skip to main content

Nagorny blusters about the return of Russia to international competition

Former Olympic and World Champion Nikita Nagorny spoke to TASS on the 23rd December.  

Nagorny speaks for himself here, trashing the IOC/FIG ban on Russia’s participation in international competition and suggesting that world sport is running back to Russia with its tail between its legs, desperate for his country’s return to World and Olympic tournaments.

Of course, I personally would like to have the Russian teams back - but only after peace has been restored!  I’ll be delighted if Melnikova, Listunova and their like can secure neutral status to compete as individuals, and I do think that the sport will be the brighter for their originality, technique and artistry.  But the world can do without Nagorny’s bullish pretence about the whole situation - which is all very sad and difficult for everyone.  

I prefer the RGF’s official, calm and professional approach to Nagorny’s rather charmless blustering.  The fierce confidence that made Nagorny such an exciting gymnast to watch now risks making him into a pariah.  Applying for neutral status in a polite and modest way, as the gymnasts are, is the only practical way forward. 

The BBC’s Steve Rosenberg last night reported on the public mood in Moscow as the new year approached. Not one Russian of the many he interviewed wanted the war against Ukraine to continue. 

It will take a lot more than these gentle voices of reason to force change on the Russian state’s approach to international relations - but it’s a start.  I’d like to think that the RGF’s actions are part of national progress towards improving communications with the West.  Nagorny’s stance isn’t helping matters, though.  I do hope he doesn’t spoil things for his former team mates.  

I present a Google translate of Nagorny’s own words here (see below) for the record, but they are in no way endorsed by the behaviour of the ‘other’ gymnasts and officials, who are quietly doing their best to continue their lives peacefully.


The more Russian athletes receive neutral status and then regain their former leading positions in the international arena, the more obvious will be the absurdity of athletes performing without their country's flag and anthem. This opinion was expressed to TASS by Nikita Nagorny, the 2020 Olympic champion in artistic gymnastics.


🇷🇺"I believe that the more our athletes win medals at international competitions - no matter what status - the faster we will return our flag and anthem," Nagorny said. "The world community sees that in artistic gymnastics, competition has dropped significantly in the absence of Russians. Having returned to international competitions, we will again begin to win awards, and many will find it absurd that Russians do not have a flag and anthem. Although, I think, many people already consider this absurd."


🤝 "The 2024 Olympics, before the start of which the International Olympic Committee (IOC) tried in every way to infringe on the rights of the qualified Russian athletes and not let them into Paris, is a thing of the past. Now there is a different story, when there is interaction between federations of specialized sports. Let me remind you that the IOC can only give recommendations to international federations, which are independent in themselves. And one by one, these organizations decide to admit our athletes in a neutral status," Nagorny concluded.


First Vice President of the Russian Gymnastics Federation (RGF) and member of the Executive Committee of the International Gymnastics Federation (FIG) Vasily Titov previously told TASS that the RGF is currently working on the issue of obtaining neutral status for domestic athletes for their subsequent return to tournaments under the auspices of the FIG.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Why on earth do I keep this blog?

I had to ask myself this question, this morning, after receiving a pretty nasty comment on my post about yesterday's floor final.  I usually make it a rule not to publish rude, poorly argued, unpleasant or profane comments; I went against that principle.  I trust that whoever 'wrote' that comment is highly embarrassed.  I can't imagine that she or he would speak like that to anyone in person. It is an unfortunate fact of life that the wider internet - social media - encourages the covert, cowardly bullying that is often disguised as argument and opinion on the various gym forums.  Some of the people posting there just don't know how to regulate their behaviour, and moderation can only work retrospectively.  I wish people would think before they post ... would YOU like to read something so rude?  Disagreements are allowed, and you don't have to like someone's writing style, but good manners cost nothing and are at the heart of a civilised society. ...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more