Skip to main content

Worlds 2015 - Nominative registrations

1997 born Dmitri Lankin, a rising star on the men's team
The FIG has now updated the nominative registration listings so you can have fun perusing them and seeing who are on the latest teams - there have been plenty of changes across the world.

One alteration - which has almost gone unnoticed so far - is the substitution of Vladimir-based gymnast Alexei Rostov with the up and coming youngster, Dmitri Lankin.  Rostov finished fifth in the Russia Cup all around, but his selection for the Worlds team was a small surprise as his name does not even appear on the national team listings on the RGF website.

1997 born Lankin, on the other hand, has been tipped by Valentina Rodionenko as a shining light amongst the promising ranks of the Russian team.  His strongest pieces are floor and parallel bars, where the Russians are already relatively strong.  Often when a youngster is substituted in at this stage, it indicates that the gymnast has earned it in training, and is considered to have 'a temperament for a big occasion'.  At present, with such big names as Belyavski, Ignatyev, Kuksenkov, Nagorny and Ablyazin making up the main contingent, his competition for the last spot is the elegant Ivan Stretovich.  Ivan finished second on pommels in Penza.  These two gymnasts each make a different contribution to the team's configuration - so it is difficult to see which way the selection will go.

Lankin with his extrovert coach, Anatoly Zabelin
Lankin comes from Rostov on Don and is coached by Anatoly Zabelin - (does anyone recognise this coach, or know his history? - he is strangely familiar to me).  He finished fourth in qualifications at Russia Cup with high scores on floor of 15.1 and 15.4 on parallel bars, but could only manage 9th in the all around final.  He didn't achieve anything special in the event finals, but he was at least consistent - 5th on floor, 4th on vault and 4th on parallel bars.  On this basis one can see why he would be selected for his possible contributions in team finals as compared to the relatively 'flat' all around scores of Rostov, but he probably won't make an impression unless one of the main gymnasts is forced to pull out.

In common with the women, this is a transitional team.  In the last year, we have seen the rise and rise of Nikita Ignatyev, who has been on the fringes for a few years, but this year has emerged as a leader all around.  I'm delighted about this - Ignatyev is a beautiful gymnast.  You can really see it in the delayed photography shot for this promotional video of an extreme sports centre close to his home in Siberia - working alongside former national team members Pakhomenko and Russinyak.  Like Nemov, he plays the fool a bit during photography; he is entitled to when he can compete for medals.  And in the air his crisp lines, effortless flight and great technical flair will offer far more of the artistic than anything you will see in the women's competition.  If I do travel to Glasgow this year - which is unlikely, because of my schedule of work - it will be to watch the men compete.

When Rodionenko picks a team, he doesn't just have to submit a list of gymnasts to the FIG - he also has to think of the coaches.  Some of them will be the main specialists and support staff from Lake Krugloye - others will be personal coaches to the gymnasts.

The mass migration of coaches away from the countries of the former Soviet Union has produced some of the conditions necessary for the current globalisation of the sport (for example, imagine Canada without Saadi and Davydova, the UK without Popov and Sizhanov, Germany without Belenkyi etc).  In the meantime Russia (and Ukraine, Belarus and the rest) has had to manage with depleted resources.   High profile investments made by bank VTB in large scale, state-of-the-art training facilities are necessary and good, but training and motivating the trainers has been difficult when salaried work as a coach is difficult to find, and degree courses are thin on the ground.

If the gymnasts lack depth - then the coaches are in a worse position.  A few years ago, I remarked that the main coaches on the national team were almost all in their sixties, seventies and, in one case, eighties.  It is, therefore, an urgent priority for Russia to rebuild its talent and opportunity, and Andrei Rodionenko has had to work hard to amend this situation.  To his credit there are now a majority of younger faces working at Lake Krugloye.  This is a starting point, but needs to continue to grass roots level.

Tumbling specialist Vasily Ivanov with reserve Anastasia Dmitrieva
On the women's side, the gymnasts who are lucky enough to travel with their personal coaches are Viktoria Komova (Gennady Elfimov), Ksenia Afanasyeva (Marina Nazarova) and Maria Kharenkova (Olga Sagina).  The men who are bringing their personal coaches to Glasgow are Denis Ablyazin (Sergei Starkin), David Belyavski (Viktor Lomaev) and, interestingly, Dmitri Lankin (Anatoly Zabelin).  Marina Ulyankina, who coaches Seda Tutkhalyan and Maria Paseka, will be at Worlds as a judge.

In the past, the selection of a personal coach to the national team has indicated that their gymnast is expected to be a leading medal winner, but I am not sure that we can follow that rule this year.  For a start, the team is of primary importance here rather than individual medals (Glasgow is the main qualifying for Rio).  Then, there is enough doubt about who will shine in the all around (both MAG and WAG) to select the coaches on the basis of their competition experience.  Unless Viktoria is going to surprise us and do all around, (I don't think she is) that might explain Elfimov's appearance on the list this time.  It might possibly, however, reveal a conviction amongst the Russian coaches that Kharenkova and Belyavski hold their strongest case in the all around competitions.  We will have to wait and see!

Finally, I noticed that the WAG team manager this time will be tumbling coach, Vasily Ivanov.  This presumably frees up head coach Evgeny Grebyonkin to concentrate on his team coaching activities.  I had to question whether there had been a change in the job roles back at Lake Krugloye, but the team manager does not have to be the national coach, and there is no change currently listed on the RGF website (although it is often out of date ...).  Ivanov is a fatherly figure who has quietly supported the girls through thick and thin and the team seems to be working well together whatever the job roles so it is probably not significant.




Comments

  1. The FIG has now confirmed the latest news - that Shelgunova has now replaced Dmitrieva.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Based on the article link below, the decision was based on how they are performing in training:
      http://sportgymrus.ru/lankin-i-shelgunova-voshli-v-sostav-sbornoj-rossii-na-ch-m-po-sportivnoj-gimnastike-v-glazgo/

      Russiafan

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

RIP Bela Karolyi

RIP Bela Karolyi. We were all mesmerised by the gymnastics that Nadia Comaneci brought to the world.    Some of us wanted to be like Nadia.    Others wanted to share her glory. When Kerri Strug saluted the judges with a hop and a cry of agony, thousands of adults cried for joy, felt inordinate pride that a love of country had inspired such courage and strength.   When generations of elite gymnasts, many of them gold medal winners, spoke out about the abuse they had experienced whilst practicing their sport, those thousands and millions of cheering adults didn’t stop appreciating the gold medals. They did start to look for someone to blame, someone who could take responsibility for the entire systemic nastiness that enabled the abuse to take place.    Some chose the man who came to fame as Nadia Comaneci’s coach, and went on to shape elite gymnastics training in the USA, Bela Karolyi. But who facilitated and enabled Karolyi?    Who endorsed the training that earned the medals?   It was

Vladimir Zaglada - coach, author, friend, father

It is with great sadness that I report here the sudden and completely unexpected death, on 5th October, of our friend Vladimir Zaglada.  I send my love and condolences to his daughter, Olesya.  My thoughts are with the whole family.   Vladimir was born in Lvov, Ukraine, in November 1944.  His father was a progressive lawyer of great courage who was known to defend those who challenged the Soviet authorities.  Vladimir trained as a sports acrobat under the developing Soviet sports system, working in the same club as Olympic champion Viktor Chukarin.  After moving to Moscow, he became a leading coach of women's gymnastics, supporting the development of high level acrobatics.  He worked particularly closely with the up and coming young gymnasts of the early 1980s - you can see him at work in the video 'You in Gymnastics'.  At the national training centre, Lake Krugloye, he worked with Filatova, Mostepanova, Yurchenko, Arzhannikova, Mukhina and more.   Around the mid 1980s Vlad

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more