Skip to main content

Russia's golden haul continues in Kazan - updated with links to full results


Russia's strategy of sending its best MAG team to the Universiade in Kazan today paid off. All rounders Nikita Ignatyev, David Belyavski and Nikolai Kuksenkov put in a solid showing, supported by specialists Denis Ablyazin (floor, vault, rings) and Emin Garibov (pommels, parallel bars and high bar). Their performance must be one of the most consistent and solid by a Russia MAG team in a long time and shows the benefits of competing at home. Ukraine finished in second place, edging Japan by slightly more than two tenths.   Ukraine's Oleg Verniaiev finished all around qualification in first place, followed by Japan's Ryohei Kato and Ukrainian Oleg Stepko.  David Belyavski finished in fourth place with Nikolai Kuksenkov following closely behind.  Less than 1 point separates the top five qualifiers in the all around.

While the strength in depth of the MAG competition is reflected in a wider diversity of gymnasts qualifying in first place for finals (see below) than in the Russia-dominated WAG competition, the gymnasts undoubtedly flourished under the relaxed atmosphere at this competition.  It was a rather scanty video coverage offered by the FISU this afternoon; the cameras seemed more interested in the audience than in the gymnastics.  Ablyazin completed his 7.1 D value floor routine with only one error, a large step to the side after his double Arabian piked, and did his vaults (Tsukahara double and handspring layout front with double twist) without error.  The gymnasts seemed to perform very evenly both within the team and across the apparatus.  Every team member has qualified to apparatus finals, and there are two Russians appearing in every final except vault and high bar. 

Ablyazin and Belyavski have qualified to floor final in first and second place.  Verniaiev and Stepko lead pommels, where Kuksenkov has qualified in third place and Garibov in fifth; Brazil's Zanetti leads rings, with Ablyazin and Ignatyev in 2nd and fourth place respectively; Korea's Yang leads vault, with Ablyazin in second place; Verniaiev and Stepko again lead parallel bars, with Belyavski and Garibov in 4th and 6th place; and finally, Hambuechen leads high bar, with Garibov in second place. 

I enjoy the performances of the fiery Ukrainian duo of Stepko and Verniaiev, who look likely to win multiple medals across the apparatus, and their exciting compatriot Igor Radivilov has also qualified to vault and rings.  These gymnasts remind me so much of the old school Soviet gymnasts - arrogant and competitive in a good way, with a fearless attitude to risk.  Verniaiev's vault in the all around at the Europeans in Moscow was a real highlight, it exploded off the top of the horse.  All of their gymnastics is performed with such conviction and self belief, I cannot believe that one day these gymnasts will not achieve some very high honours.  Alongside the developing elan of the Russian team and of course the strength of the other established and developing powerhouses in men's gymnastics, including Great Britian, this promises much for the depth of the men's competition in Antwerp, which I am looking forward to almost more than the women's.

Team results

All Around results

Floor results
 
Pommel horse results 

Vault results

Vaults 1 and 2 results

Parallel bars results

High bar results






Comments

  1. http://kaban.tv/rossiya-2-online That's the replay for the men's competition. The link I gave for the women's AA also archives the competitions. That means they most likely will archive the Women's AA as well! I am very happy for the Russian men and women. The medals look very cool. I love how they spin and are cut.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Aliya's beam was posted! http://vk.com/video175850425_165790615

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Aliya Mustafina - I competed as best I could

Picture credit RGF Aliya speaks in Sports Express http://news.sport-express.ru/2014-05-18/699607 I am very pleased with my performance today, I don't know what the judges didn't like about my bars, but I didn't ask them ... I did my routine fairly well without serious error. On beam I didn't have the start value but I received the highest execution score.  We will try to fix that before the World Championships. Considering the problems I had with my ankle, I think I performed to the optimum at the moment.  I did everything I could. I'm not  the least bit sorry that I performed here -  Very glad that I could help the team. I think my presence made things easier for the girls.   It is very difficult to compete at such serious senior competitions for the first time.  Of course they were very worried.   But I'm sure that with time they will learn to cope easily with their nerves (smiles). 

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...

Does Komova need gymnastics?

Komova - a prodigious talent for performance I have been pondering the nature of gymnastics talent recently, while viewing some videos of 1992 competitions on YouTube - you can find links to them if you like, by visiting RRG's Facebook page. What was it that made the Soviets so outstanding?  In the videos, you will see three champions, side by side, each competing close to perfect routines almost every time they hit the podium.  No sprung floor, no vaulting table, a Code that (1) required compulsory as well as optional routines to be prepared, (2) encouraged innovation in single moves of extreme difficulty, (3) required balanced performances of artistic as well as technical merit, and (4) recognised and rewarded virtuosity.   The three champions I am speaking of each satisfied the Code in different ways: Boguinskaia had unique and incredible grace and amplitude; Lyssenko expressed emotional intensity through an amazing combination of power, difficulty and artistry; Gutsu ...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more