Skip to main content

1983 World Championships - WAG

It's worth watching these timeless videos.  Check out the routines of Alla Shishova, especially on beam.  She was ahead of her time.  Also observe the magnificent artistry of Olga Mostepanova and Natalia Yurchenko.  Neither gymnast had intricate choreography, but they were both captivating.  Their work conveyed emotional as well as technical impact.  Yurchenko moves slowly, floating through the air.  Who would think that such a light, slender gymnast as Mostepanova could find all that air time in her tumbles?  Technique, not muscle, gave these gymnasts their power.  Their artistry came from the consummate grasp of technique, something that cannot be expressed as execution or entertainment.  Ilienko, Bicherova, Frolova are other classical members of this team.  They will all be remembered for a very long time.

The Soviet team managed to fall off beam even in those days, but their superior difficulty and technique lifted them above the rest of the field.

The equipment was different in those days, most clearly the vault, bars and floor but the beam is softer now.  These gymnasts also had to prepare two different sets of routines, compulsory and optional.  The discipline of the compulsory programme, which evaluated artistry via a close focus on technique, shows in the optional routines.

You will also enjoy seeing the work of the Romanian and British teams.  Boryana Stoyanova of Bulgaria shines, as does Maxi Gnauck.

WAG team final



WAG AA final




WAG event finals

Comments

  1. ackkkkkk.........don't even get me started!!...........forget the "technique" issue, how 'bout how much variety in skills are shown in these exercises......

    ReplyDelete
  2. Have you noticed how differences in the commentary between the UK and US sourced video? Frolova's floor - delicious silence from Alan Weeks and the BBC. Boryana Stoyanova - epic over commentary from ?? including the need to point out the 'endurance' required for the final tumble. If this formed a nation's perceptions of gymnastics, it certainly explains a lot. Oh, she focuses on toe point even then, as if that explains the Soviet superiority. Just imagine, all those spectators at home thinking that toe point was what defined a champion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh I miss those lovely creative flowing beam routines. Now it's all long pause/something really difficult/major wobble/balance check/something really difficult again/long pause/balance check and so on.

    Apart from Afanasyeva of course!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hello Queen E, have you seen this article yet? I wonder where the original interview is with this information. I know it is entirely silly to speculate on contenders for Rio already especially given the unpredictability of injury but this is interesting...wondering what the Rodionenkos plan is with this odd announcement.

    http://www.flogymnastics.com/article/38610-russia-names-four-members-to-2016-rio-team

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that it is an odd announcement and for that reason (and also end of term fatigue) I have decided not to cover it. The only reason the Rodionenkos can be making such decisions early on can be administrative/funding, as required by the ROC or Ministry of Sport. I don't really think there is much to be learned from it, apart from perhaps the rise of junior Natalia Kapitanova - and even that is more of an observation from recent results than any announcement.
      There have been several such announcements, by the way.

      Delete
    2. Ahh, thank you as always for your thoughts! We all wait eagerly for the of this next competitive season to see what this crazy Olympic year will end up bringing for us spectators. Get some rest and Happy Holidays!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Andrei Rodionenko explains Russia's performance at Worlds - Lupitatranslates

Rodionenko with European Champion David Belyavski  Courtesy RGF/Elena Mikhailova This is the interview that many people on the internet have already commented on, regarding Andrei Rodionenko's alleged racism.  The original, Russian language version, appears on VTB Bank's website (VTB are sponsors of Russian gymnastics).  It takes cleverer people than me to decide what is racism, what is deliberately perjorative, and what is inferred in an interviewer's question.  For now, I will not comment on this, therefore, but I would ask you to read Lupita's translation carefully before you form your own opinion.   I am providing some links below which might help you to decide where you stand. Definition of racism Definition of sexism BBC Sport article by Matthew Syed : Is it wrong to note that 100m winners are always black?            Updated 24/10 CSKA Moscow: UEFA opens racist chants case         ...

Nelli Kim - 'Russian gymnastics has closed in on itself' - Lupita translates

Lupita has translated this ITAR-TASS interview with Nelli Kim.  It's controversial, to say the least. Ed's note : much of the initial response to this interview - both here and in the wider gymternet -  has focussed on the detail of Kim's words and especially her comments about Viktoria Komova, and smiling.  But I think these have to be taken in context, and not too literally. Don't forget that just a day ago Andrei Rodionenko complained bitterly about the judging in Antwerp, calling Kim's behaviour 'aggressive'. Kim is responding to this here, and to the wider current context of Russian gymnastics.  What she is essentially saying to the Russian coach is 'get your own house in order, produce confident, disciplined, well trained gymnasts - stop complaining, do your job, and I will do mine.'   She goes about saying this in a somewhat long winded way and says some things along the way that seem contradictory, unfair, inappropriate even for th...

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more