Skip to main content

Shushunova versus Silivas


1988 Olympic all around champion Elena Shushunova and silver medallist Daniela Silivas on the podium in Seoul

In truth it was the last big showdown of women's Olympic artistic gymnastics.  For those of us watching at home in London on our TV screens, in the wee small hours (2 or 3 am by memory) of Friday September 23rd, a gymnastics drama unfurled.  The main actors in the play - talented Romanian, Daniela Silivas, and her fierce Soviet rival, Elena Shushunova.  Bit parts were played by the defending World Champion, Aurelia Dobre, only recently recovered from a serious knee injury, and the up and coming Godess of gymnastics, Svetlana Boguinskaia.  

At the Rotterdam World Championships barely a year before, all four gymnasts had seen an overturning of gymnastics' status quo as the deep and exciting Romanian team defeated the expected champions, the Soviet Union.  Despite Romania's dominance there, Silivas had been wounded as she fell short of gold in the all around, defeated by her younger compatriot, Dobre, and the defending World Champion, Shushunova.  Shushunova and the Soviet team were humiliated to take home only a silver in the team and a silver in the all around; Shushunova's golds on vault and floor were mere consolation prizes.  Boguinskaia was the only other Soviet woman to take a medal there, a bronze on beam.  A lot of hurt feelings oozed from the world's top gymnasts as they travelled home from Rotterdam.  Seoul would not be a grudge match, but it certainly was an opportunity for Silivas and Shushunova to re-assert their sporting worth.

Mental warfare?  An iconic image from the Seoul Olympic Games - Shushunova, left, meditates in preparation for her final piece.  Silivas, directly next to her, has finished her competition and relaxes.  

The Soviets went home, licked their wounds for a short while, then prepared and refreshed themselves for a fight with their strongest rivals for many a year.  'We'll roll right over them, like a tank', said Shushunova in an interview with news magazine Time shortly before the Games.  Her demeanour in the first days of the Games showed that the Soviet women meant business in Seoul.  Her attack, vigour and purpose was a case study of best practice in team leadership.  Interviewed after the Games, Shushunova emphasised that her main worry was that her team won back its winning position.  By the time she had made it to the all around final, she felt that her main job was already done.

Unsurprisingly, Shushunova, facially at least, looked exhausted in the all around competition that followed rapidly on the heels of the team final.   Two days of draining competition - compulsories, then optionals - had already taken their toll.  There had been medal ceremonies and media appearances.  In those days, consistency over all parts of the competition mattered.  Scores from the team competition were averaged out and carried forward to the all around final, and to the event finals.  At the beginning of the all around, Shushunova had a minuscule lead of .005 over Silivas, little enough of a cushion when a fall could mean a deduction of .5.  Shushunova had been faultless in the team competition, but Silivas had suffered a low landing on her first tumble - a double double - on optional floor.  Despite the narrow margin, this early mistake really counted, but Shushunova would still need to compete without error if she was to win the gold.

The competition between these two gymnasts is often depicted as one of grace (Silivas) versus power (Shushunova), but this is an oversimplification.  Silivas certainly had the more accessible style of artistry, an easy smile that drew the audience to her.  In comparison, Shushunova looked severe, until she let loose with that smile of victory that spread all over her face.  Silivas had a lovely airy, gravity-defying feel to all her gymnastics, while Shushunova's acrobatics were mighty explosions that rocketed sky-high.  Both gymnasts were equal when it came to line, grace and choreography.  Shushunova found her artistry in expressive dance on the floor, innovative technique on all four apparatus, and virtuoso performances of ultra difficult acrobatics.  (She had skills named after her in the Code of Points on every piece of apparatus.). Silivas' artistry came from a softness in her line, a spontaneity and speed in her movement, and crowd appealing gimmicks on the floor.  

In the end, in Seoul, the medal was determined by a mere whisper of a difference - .025 - in Shushunova's favour.  The tiny difference was down to human error.  Shushunova seemed almost super human at these Games, barely giving the judges a breath at deductions, most notably in a hop on her landing off uneven bars, and the tiniest whim of a wobble in beam.  Silivas, meantime, gave away that floor flub in team optionals as well as two beam teeters.  It really was as close as that.  For many who never saw the competition in its entirety, the final vault was the deciding moment.  It was indeed a thrilling end to three days of competition, but in reality, as it turned out, Silivas had lost it on the floor on the first day.  Silivas did have a better day in event finals, winning 3 out of 4 golds, but a major world all around gold proved to be forever out of her reach.

The selection of the USSR team in Seoul wasn't without controversy as Shushunova's co-World Champion from 1985, Oksana Omelianchik, was demoted to travelling reserve.  This will forever be a point of contention for all those who considered Omelianchik to merit selection on the basis of her past victories and the unique quality of her gymnastics.  Let Oksana have the final word on this classic competition.  'In Seoul, Elena could do everything', she said in an interview after the Games. You can hear her at the very end of Shushunova's all around competition - those cries of joy at the stuck landing came from Omelianchik.

Results of the 1988 Olympic Games WAG competition

BBC Barry Davies' reflections on Shushunova versus Silivas

Silivas floor, team optionals

Shushunova floor, team optionals

Silivas beam, AA

Shushunova beam AA

Women's AA final

Comments

  1. Oksana, a class act as always!

    OMG poor Daniela, that HAIR. I know they were trying to age her up but couldn't they have tried for a more flattering look?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Considering that it was the 80's, a more flattering look was simply impossible.

      Delete
    2. Oskana was Elena Shushunova's best friend and really acted like one. She was such an example of sportsmanship and grace in defeat at not being chosen.
      As for the hair, East German hair was the most 80s and most embarrassing.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M

Andrei Rodionenko explains Russia's performance at Worlds - Lupitatranslates

Rodionenko with European Champion David Belyavski  Courtesy RGF/Elena Mikhailova This is the interview that many people on the internet have already commented on, regarding Andrei Rodionenko's alleged racism.  The original, Russian language version, appears on VTB Bank's website (VTB are sponsors of Russian gymnastics).  It takes cleverer people than me to decide what is racism, what is deliberately perjorative, and what is inferred in an interviewer's question.  For now, I will not comment on this, therefore, but I would ask you to read Lupita's translation carefully before you form your own opinion.   I am providing some links below which might help you to decide where you stand. Definition of racism Definition of sexism BBC Sport article by Matthew Syed : Is it wrong to note that 100m winners are always black?            Updated 24/10 CSKA Moscow: UEFA opens racist chants case             http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/24654499 Andrei

Review of Russian WAG at the 2014 World Championships

The Russians during a team talk in training for the World Championships.  Courtesy RGF Bronze all the way for Russia then.  Beyond the euphoria and surprise of this morning's competition there doesn't really seem to be much to write home about. I am delighted for Aliya personally that the efforts she has made to help the team have provided her with some tangible result, but the principal feeling at the end of the competition is that of relief.  As Vaitsekhovskaya said in her article last week, there were no moments of shock and awe from the Russians, and that's what will be needed if they are to compete for gold medals in Rio (translation available here ). Let's consider a timeline of the competition : before, during and after. BEFORE The promise of a return to the Worlds stage by Viktoria Komova gave Russia a feeling of optimism pre-Russia Cup.  However, Viktoria's performance at this important competition gave little reason for celebration.  Ye

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more