Skip to main content

Beam heritage

By
Mustafina's beam at the Antwerp World Championships may well have expressed the Code to its fullest artistic potential in that event final, on that day.

But what has the additive Code, and other progressive changes to the sport, done to beam?

One of the most beautiful beam routines ever can be found here.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous11 November 2013 at 19:27

    The only difference I see is that gymnasts back then had slower routines because the routines had less elements and they could actually perform everything more delicately and the form is very exquisite, but you don't see so much choreography. You could say Mustafina had more choreography in her 2010 routine than this one.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfeIAsVZJVs

    I think Baitova's beam is better example of what beam choreography should be but her form is not as clean as Mostepanova's routine. Overall her routine is artistically better than Baitova's since it had everything.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12 November 2013 at 09:56

      The best example is Omelianchik's beam at the European Championships. She had difficulty, perfect execution AND it was an exciting performance.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12 November 2013 at 10:23

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sob4ag0X5yo

      Delete
    3. Queen Elizabeth12 November 2013 at 11:59

      I love this routine too.

      Delete
  2. cpt.Hook11 November 2013 at 21:16

    What a beautiful and amazing gymnast she was.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous19 November 2013 at 12:54

    Good point about the length of the routines. Here's an idea perhaps allowing a little longer to allow the gymnast to present and get limited say 0.5 -1.0 maybe of "bonus" marks for what is somehow defined as artistic dance so it is pretty much compulsory to do it. In other words not what I think of as acro-dance ie skills that carry a genuine risk of a fall or other big deduction like a switch leap or multiple spin. Maybe difficulty value would be limited to A,B say but connection bonuses could apply. Say if five moves of lower difficulty were scored on a hit or miss basis gymnasts would always attempt to perform them perfectly and hopefully we'd get some more interesting routines Maybe there could be a moderate deduction for overall lack of presentation/artistry throughout the exercise that no-one can afford to lose (so that gymnasts will overdo it to make sure) in addition to the specifics of execution deductions of the acro - the most difficult however many skills as now that are the D score. I like this kind of concept from the point of view of the progression of gymnasts from beginner up as well. AAAGH the artistry question! Shoot me down happily but I'm waiting for some much better ideas to get some serious discussion because the sport is getting more and more ugly by the minute and so less and less appealing to the wider public. If anything, if nothing changes bars and vault have more potential to remain the more artistic event because they are really a technical performance where execution and successful completion of a skill tend to, or have to, go together - would it be good for execution deductions to be proportional to the difficulty like in diving with its tariff system...??????? Going back to perfect ten is certainly not the answer - it must be demonstrable how any particular judge has arrived at their contribution to the score.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

By
I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI
Post a Comment
Read more

RIP Bela Karolyi

By
RIP Bela Karolyi. We were all mesmerised by the gymnastics that Nadia Comaneci brought to the world.    Some of us wanted to be like Nadia.    Others wanted to share her glory. When Kerri Strug saluted the judges with a hop and a cry of agony, thousands of adults cried for joy, felt inordinate pride that a love of country had inspired such courage and strength.   When generations of elite gymnasts, many of them gold medal winners, spoke out about the abuse they had experienced whilst practicing their sport, those thousands and millions of cheering adults didn’t stop appreciating the gold medals. They did start to look for someone to blame, someone who could take responsibility for the entire systemic nastiness that enabled the abuse to take place.    Some chose the man who came to fame as Nadia Comaneci’s coach, and went on to shape elite gymnastics training in the USA, Bela Karolyi. But who facilitated and enabled Karolyi?    Who endorsed the training that earned the medals?   It was
Post a Comment
Read more

Vladimir Zaglada - coach, author, friend, father

By
It is with great sadness that I report here the sudden and completely unexpected death, on 5th October, of our friend Vladimir Zaglada.  I send my love and condolences to his daughter, Olesya.  My thoughts are with the whole family.   Vladimir was born in Lvov, Ukraine, in November 1944.  His father was a progressive lawyer of great courage who was known to defend those who challenged the Soviet authorities.  Vladimir trained as a sports acrobat under the developing Soviet sports system, working in the same club as Olympic champion Viktor Chukarin.  After moving to Moscow, he became a leading coach of women's gymnastics, supporting the development of high level acrobatics.  He worked particularly closely with the up and coming young gymnasts of the early 1980s - you can see him at work in the video 'You in Gymnastics'.  At the national training centre, Lake Krugloye, he worked with Filatova, Mostepanova, Yurchenko, Arzhannikova, Mukhina and more.   Around the mid 1980s Vlad
Post a Comment
Read more

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more