Skip to main content

Vasily Titov speaks on neutral participation

More thoughts from Titov on neutral participation and the Olympics.  Pozdnyakov is President of the Russian Olympic Committee.


As ever with these situations, opinion seems to wax and wane from time to time and person to person.  This might be aberrations in the press reports or it could be attempts to clean up what was said before: who knows.  I just wish that the FIG would issue their criteria now, and would make it clear.  


Google translation via RIA SPORT. 


‘Vasily Titov 


“I fully support the words of Stanislav Pozdnyakov that the Olympic Games should not be boycotted. This is an honest and completely accurate look at the situation. The issue with signing consent documents with a neutral status is that there is always an element of personal choice. And in this case, each athlete will have to decide whether he is ready to do this or not. Therefore, I do not see any contradiction between Pozdnyakov’s words and the statement of the Russian President. I believe that you should not miss the opportunity to perform at the Games. If our athletes have any chances, then we must take advantage of them. We shouldn't slam the door - that's what they're waiting for.


If we do this, we will only make life easier for those who started this whole mess - the IOC. We are in close contact with the International Gymnastics Federation. Unfortunately, FIG has not yet developed criteria for the neutrality of athletes, and we do not yet understand what will be included in them. Therefore, it is difficult to say which of our athletes can qualify for participation in the Olympic Games. And FIG knows what the red lines are for us - none of the Russian gymnasts will sign a declaration condemning the special military operation. This is the common position of all our athletes.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Why on earth do I keep this blog?

I had to ask myself this question, this morning, after receiving a pretty nasty comment on my post about yesterday's floor final.  I usually make it a rule not to publish rude, poorly argued, unpleasant or profane comments; I went against that principle.  I trust that whoever 'wrote' that comment is highly embarrassed.  I can't imagine that she or he would speak like that to anyone in person. It is an unfortunate fact of life that the wider internet - social media - encourages the covert, cowardly bullying that is often disguised as argument and opinion on the various gym forums.  Some of the people posting there just don't know how to regulate their behaviour, and moderation can only work retrospectively.  I wish people would think before they post ... would YOU like to read something so rude?  Disagreements are allowed, and you don't have to like someone's writing style, but good manners cost nothing and are at the heart of a civilised society. ...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more