Skip to main content

Russian gymnastics 'will be difficult to rebuild' while Rodionenko remains, says Alexandrov

In an interview with Alexander Alexandrov in this month's (January/February) edition of International Gymnast magazine, the former head coach of Russian WAG makes it clear that his opinions of the problems of Russian gymnastics have remained the same since his August  conversation with RRG.  

Alexandrov looks ahead to his job in Rio and elsewhere in Brazil, and discusses some of the prospects; I'll leave that to the excellent Brazil gym blogs to cover.  However, despite his current commitment as Head of the Brazil WAG team, he takes pains to comment on the somewhat dismal state of affairs on the Russia WAG team.  At one point he goes so far as to say

'I personally believe that there should be separate programs for the development and growth of the sport for the entire country, and these programs should be different.  This in my opinion will help to develop and raise the 'masses' and will help with the retention problem in gymnastics.

One of the main problems Russia has today is that there is practically no reserve.  Andrei Rodionenko does not agree with this point of view and measures, so there is very little retention to this day.  I think that as long as the Rodionenkos are in charge of the sport, rebuilding the Russian gymnastics program will be very problematic.'

Alexandrov is here clarifying and adding to the discussion of gymnast and coach retention which has recently been the subject of an open letter to Rodionenko on VK.com, published by Chelyabinsk coach Andrei Telitsyn.  The letter highlighted the problematic nature of raising the difficulty standard for Master of Sport qualification.  Alexandrov himself had raised the same issue at an a executive meeting of the RGF prior to his departure from Moscow and discusses its importance in some depth in his RRG August interview. These issues are important because they are ultimately designed to make the sport sustainable in the Russian Federation. 


Alexandrov continues, discussing some of the circumstances surrounding the preparation of the Olympic team, his relationship with the Rodionenkos and the financing of Russian gymnastics, before considering his work in Brazil.  

The fact that Alexandrov continues to speak out on this matter, some six months after his departure from his home country, is extraordinary.  His tone is becoming increasingly statesmanlike as he addresses issues and suggests solutions, on both a local and international level. He also addresses the widely held concerns about the Code of Points and artistry, suggesting that the FIG will need to call a meeting of coaches soon in order to resolve some of the problems. 

'Surely', he says, 'collectively we can come up with agreeable solutions that will benefit both the artistry and difficulty'.

Related reading






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Artistry versus acrobatics???

Watching videos of this weekend's competitions - the qualification and all around rounds of the Russian championships, medal winners from the American Cup - I am struck, more and more, by the huge difference between the American and Russian schools of gymnastics. It led me to ask the question : do artistry and acrobatics have to be mutually exclusive? (I am afraid that I think naming 'American' gymnastics a 'school' is perhaps lending an undeserved dignity to work which has become excessively obsessed with the difficult and the consistent, but I am using the word here so as not to label unfairly those individual gymnasts who are blameless in the direction of their training.) The FIG's vision for gymnastics is said to embrace more artistry; at least the publicity it has put about on the subject of its new Code makes that fairly plain.  So perhaps the Russians, with their inconsistent brilliance and superior body carriage (Mustafina, Komova, Grishina, Afanasy...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more