Skip to main content

Russia prevails, against the odds


Maria Paseka in flight  Courtesy of the RGF
It has been a curious European Championships so far, for the Russian women.  A team somewhat depleted of new talent is looking to its veterans to carry Russia into the future.  It is a tricky year : with the Universiade coming up in the summer, and Worlds in the autumn, last summer's Olympians face a hectic and pressured time.  You get the feeling that the girls are almost reluctant participants in this, the earliest major competition of the year.  There has just been so much extra curricular activity going on; instead of focussing on the gymnastics, the girls have been at the centre of what at times has resembled the plot of a soap opera.

Regardless of the reality of their everyday training, the picture presented of their lives in sport is far from ordered.  For Mustafina, there has been an unsettling circumstance surrounding the status of her personal coach, Alexander Alexandrov, a man she last year called her 'second father', but who this year was quietly removed from the team roster at the last minute without explanation. The strongest competitor that Russia has had for many a year, its only Olympic gold medallist in the discipline, has been labelled as 'difficult' and 'lazy'.  For Grishina, there has been a change of personal coaching arrangements and a barrage of public criticism  from the Head Coach of the Russian team.  For Afanasyeva, new ambitions have been hyped beyond reasonable belief.  It is almost as though the words have become more important than the deeds, a good story for the press more important than the gymnastics.  You would think that the main thing would be that every gymnast prepared and performed to the best of her ability, wouldn't you?

Who knows whether the many changing stories surrounding their training influenced the results of today's qualifying competition.  Certainly, the level of expectation of the girls always seemed unrealistic to me.  The results certainly aren't disastrous.  Russia vaulted very well. Paseka, the only team member not exposed to some form of verbal assault this year or last, delivered to, and perhaps exceeded promise with places in both vault and bars finals.  Afanasyeva tumbled brilliantly on floor to finish there in first place.  Grishina recovered from a poor start to pull out what was least expected of her in the form of a solid floor exercise and qualification to the all around and beam finals.  Mustafina looked as though she was holding it all together, just as she always does ... until that awful beam exercise where she suffered the indignity of not one, but two falls, and looked somewhat discombobulated to boot.  With a mark in the 11s to carry, she squeezed into the all around final as Russia's second representative behind the much maligned Grishina, but was also the top qualifier on bars, and third on floor.  All four Russians have qualified to event finals; they lead the standings in two pieces, and have three gymnasts in the top five individual ranks from qualifications.

Yet all three qualifications all arounders suffered errors and at times looked to lack fitness, at a time when the sport demands more and more of its practitioners in terms of reliability and athleticism.  Choreographic passages were omitted from floor exericses to preserve energy for the tumbles.  Afanasyeva still performed with ambition and commitment on this piece, but a fall to her side on bars dismount, not surprisingly, led to a dispirited beam outcome.  All three all arounders suffered falls in their programmes.  I expect that the two qualified gymnasts (Grishina and Mustafina) wlll do better in the all around, and I so would like to see Afanasyeva win floor, but then I am an optimist.

Meanwhile, the two gymnasts from Romania (Iordache and Bulimar) looked full of life.  Either Bulimar or Iordache would be worthy all around champions this year, and they also look likely to sweep balance beam, a final with only one Russian qualified, Anastasia Grishina, thanks to the withdrawal of Britain's unlucky Gabby Jupp.  Russia managed to qualify six spots in event finals from a bank of four competing athletes.  Romania 'only' managed to qualify to five berths, but from a team of just two.  All members of both teams will compete again this week at least once.

Yet I am left with an uncomfortable feeling about the Russians. After all the talk, all the rearrangement of coaching, and the appointment of new specialists like beam coach Marina Bulashenko, you would expect them to look better prepared for this competition, the first home European Championships for Russia since 1998.  After all, other gymnasts have faced the rigours of Olympic preparation, are looking forward to a busy summer, and seem to have reached a better pitch of readiness. 

Tomorrow, we will see what the gymnasts can do.  I still feel convinced that a Romanian will take gold and that the Russians will have to wait for event finals if they want to be champions.  This competition has, put simply, come a little too early for them.   They will all, surely, be better prepared for the big competitions of the summer and the autumn.    They will have to be.  In their second home competition, the Universiade in Kazan, the Ministry of Sport is demanding results.

Find links to the scores here.

All around qualifiers



Vault qualifiers


Bars qualifiers


Beam qualifiers


Floor qualifiers


Comments

  1. You raise an interesting point. To me, it seems that European Championships would be far more important than the Universiade Games but the way you said the Ministry is demanding results makes me wonder if there's actually more stake in that competition. When I think of all the interviews that have been translated here, they constantly mention the Universiade Games. I'm curious if they're plan is to peak then. Russia also probably thought they were seeing a "depleted" Romanian team here at European Championships and didn't have much to worry about but the Romanians are there to fight. The final medal count will be interesting to see and I question if there's some importance of the Games that I'm not seeing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Russian Government has invested immense amounts of money in building new facilities for the Universiade, and are promoting mega sporting events as a key part of their strategy to encourage investment in restructuring and in developing tourism. The Sochi Olympics are upcoming in 2014, the Football World Cup in 2018, and St Petersburg is a candidate city for the 2028 Olympics. Yes, there is long term planning!
      Much of the pre competition communication we saw - interviews with the gymnasts and with Valentina Rodionenko were primarily issued via the communications centre of the Russian Ministry for Sports.
      Originally, Europeans were slated to be staged in Kazan, but for some reason were transferred to Moscow late last year. I guess that not everything is ready.
      Thus there is a strategic reason for the importance of Kazan and the Universiade in terms of promoting the best of Russian sport. The Universiade's importance has been further highlighted recently by the declaration that Komova has made that if she passes her final year exams, and can register for University, she will compete there, assuming she is physically ready.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

RIP Bela Karolyi

RIP Bela Karolyi. We were all mesmerised by the gymnastics that Nadia Comaneci brought to the world.    Some of us wanted to be like Nadia.    Others wanted to share her glory. When Kerri Strug saluted the judges with a hop and a cry of agony, thousands of adults cried for joy, felt inordinate pride that a love of country had inspired such courage and strength.   When generations of elite gymnasts, many of them gold medal winners, spoke out about the abuse they had experienced whilst practicing their sport, those thousands and millions of cheering adults didn’t stop appreciating the gold medals. They did start to look for someone to blame, someone who could take responsibility for the entire systemic nastiness that enabled the abuse to take place.    Some chose the man who came to fame as Nadia Comaneci’s coach, and went on to shape elite gymnastics training in the USA, Bela Karolyi. But who facilitated and enabled Karolyi?    Who endorsed the training that earned the medals?   It was

Vladimir Zaglada - coach, author, friend, father

It is with great sadness that I report here the sudden and completely unexpected death, on 5th October, of our friend Vladimir Zaglada.  I send my love and condolences to his daughter, Olesya.  My thoughts are with the whole family.   Vladimir was born in Lvov, Ukraine, in November 1944.  His father was a progressive lawyer of great courage who was known to defend those who challenged the Soviet authorities.  Vladimir trained as a sports acrobat under the developing Soviet sports system, working in the same club as Olympic champion Viktor Chukarin.  After moving to Moscow, he became a leading coach of women's gymnastics, supporting the development of high level acrobatics.  He worked particularly closely with the up and coming young gymnasts of the early 1980s - you can see him at work in the video 'You in Gymnastics'.  At the national training centre, Lake Krugloye, he worked with Filatova, Mostepanova, Yurchenko, Arzhannikova, Mukhina and more.   Around the mid 1980s Vlad

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more