Skip to main content

London 2012 ticketing report


The organising committee of the London Olympics (LOCOG) has finally published full details of ticketing at the Olympic Games, including how many were eventually sold to the public rather than given away to sponsors and dignitaries, and how many tickets were available in each price category.

Despite the fact that the public and press have been baying and begging for this information for most of the past year, LOCOG have chosen to publish their report as quietly as possible, without any accompanying press releases or events, and right upon the cusp of Christmas, at the same time as the UK media is sizzling with news stories left, right and centre.  Almost as though they would like to keep some of the facts as quiet as possible; after all, they have managed to convince us that the Games were an immense success.

Which, in the main, I agree with.  I don't want to say goodbye to 2012; the Olympics brought much happy spirit to the city of London and its people, and I don't think Londoners will ever be the same again.

That happy spirit wasn't about the ticketing, though.  While I was delighted to secure my one Olympic ticket, to the WAG qualifying, at 10.30 on the night before the competition (it was a lifelong ambition realised)  I was less pleased to see all the empty seats around me, knowing how many of my friends would have given an arm and a leg to be there if only they could have managed to navigate the many barriers that were put in their way and which made obtaining tickets far too difficult for the majority.  I have never before seen regiments of soldiers occupying whole sections of a gymnastics arena.  LOCOG does not mention its somewhat desperate rent a crowd efforts designed to make relatively empty arenas look full, and indeed we are now hearing about 'sell out' events.  This may be true of certain sports, but not of the gymnastics.  You just had to use your eyes to see this.

Of course, having all the data available isn't necessarily a good thing as it's rather indigestible and difficult to interpret.  I need some time to print out the key sections and read them properly, to avoid misrepresenting what is there.  There are some apparently simple data: overall, 59% of tickets for the artistic gymnastics were sold to the public; I find this a surprisingly high percentage but that is what the figures say.  I have, however, noticed that for certain events, in certain price categories, the figure comes down to as low as 35%.  In other words, you might say, about two thirds of these tickets were given away to sponsors and dignitaries, presumably the top priced tickets for the premium finals, which might explain why there were so many empty seats visible on our TV screens, even towards the end of the competition. 

The, there are the unfathomables : for example, were rent-a-crowd counted as sold, or unsold? Are all these statistics strictly accurate? I remain convinced that there was an almighty balls-up in the initial ballot that left so many of us disappointed.  Ticketing will remain a thorn in the side of the London Olympic Games. 

I'm still very glad I managed to be there, though.

Comments

  1. That always seems to be a problem with Olympics - ticketing, they have all these so called important people getting special tickets and don't show up.

    Here is a new interview with Aliya...I think. After the New Year maybe you all could translate it.

    http://www.newizv.ru/sport/2012-12-28/175359-alija-mustafina.html

    Happy New Year when it comes

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More thoughts on US gymnastics, Karolyi - and Zaglada

I’d like to add some thoughts to my earlier post about USA gymnastics and Bela Karolyi:  1. What Bela did, he did. He would agree that his actions were his responsibility. 2. Abusive relationships in USA gymnastics (and no doubt elsewhere) pre-existed Bela’s move to the USA and still exist today. 3. Harsh training existed and exists in all of the ‘artistic’ sports and dance-related forms - eg ballroom dancing, ballet, ice skating, circus.  The training involved in most of these activities is founded on an assumption of the benefits of early specialisation.  It revolves around  ‘ideal’ forms, shapes and postures that are difficult to achieve without early years training - women especially.   4. Wherever prodigious early talent exists, there are predators whose main desire in life is to take advantage of that talent - music, entertainment, maths, sport.  The boundaries very easily become confused.  Who owns the talent?  Who decides how many hours to work, at what level?  FOR WHOSE BENEFI

RIP Bela Karolyi

RIP Bela Karolyi. We were all mesmerised by the gymnastics that Nadia Comaneci brought to the world.    Some of us wanted to be like Nadia.    Others wanted to share her glory. When Kerri Strug saluted the judges with a hop and a cry of agony, thousands of adults cried for joy, felt inordinate pride that a love of country had inspired such courage and strength.   When generations of elite gymnasts, many of them gold medal winners, spoke out about the abuse they had experienced whilst practicing their sport, those thousands and millions of cheering adults didn’t stop appreciating the gold medals. They did start to look for someone to blame, someone who could take responsibility for the entire systemic nastiness that enabled the abuse to take place.    Some chose the man who came to fame as Nadia Comaneci’s coach, and went on to shape elite gymnastics training in the USA, Bela Karolyi. But who facilitated and enabled Karolyi?    Who endorsed the training that earned the medals?   It was

Vladimir Zaglada - coach, author, friend, father

It is with great sadness that I report here the sudden and completely unexpected death, on 5th October, of our friend Vladimir Zaglada.  I send my love and condolences to his daughter, Olesya.  My thoughts are with the whole family.   Vladimir was born in Lvov, Ukraine, in November 1944.  His father was a progressive lawyer of great courage who was known to defend those who challenged the Soviet authorities.  Vladimir trained as a sports acrobat under the developing Soviet sports system, working in the same club as Olympic champion Viktor Chukarin.  After moving to Moscow, he became a leading coach of women's gymnastics, supporting the development of high level acrobatics.  He worked particularly closely with the up and coming young gymnasts of the early 1980s - you can see him at work in the video 'You in Gymnastics'.  At the national training centre, Lake Krugloye, he worked with Filatova, Mostepanova, Yurchenko, Arzhannikova, Mukhina and more.   Around the mid 1980s Vlad

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more