Skip to main content

London 2012 ticketing report


The organising committee of the London Olympics (LOCOG) has finally published full details of ticketing at the Olympic Games, including how many were eventually sold to the public rather than given away to sponsors and dignitaries, and how many tickets were available in each price category.

Despite the fact that the public and press have been baying and begging for this information for most of the past year, LOCOG have chosen to publish their report as quietly as possible, without any accompanying press releases or events, and right upon the cusp of Christmas, at the same time as the UK media is sizzling with news stories left, right and centre.  Almost as though they would like to keep some of the facts as quiet as possible; after all, they have managed to convince us that the Games were an immense success.

Which, in the main, I agree with.  I don't want to say goodbye to 2012; the Olympics brought much happy spirit to the city of London and its people, and I don't think Londoners will ever be the same again.

That happy spirit wasn't about the ticketing, though.  While I was delighted to secure my one Olympic ticket, to the WAG qualifying, at 10.30 on the night before the competition (it was a lifelong ambition realised)  I was less pleased to see all the empty seats around me, knowing how many of my friends would have given an arm and a leg to be there if only they could have managed to navigate the many barriers that were put in their way and which made obtaining tickets far too difficult for the majority.  I have never before seen regiments of soldiers occupying whole sections of a gymnastics arena.  LOCOG does not mention its somewhat desperate rent a crowd efforts designed to make relatively empty arenas look full, and indeed we are now hearing about 'sell out' events.  This may be true of certain sports, but not of the gymnastics.  You just had to use your eyes to see this.

Of course, having all the data available isn't necessarily a good thing as it's rather indigestible and difficult to interpret.  I need some time to print out the key sections and read them properly, to avoid misrepresenting what is there.  There are some apparently simple data: overall, 59% of tickets for the artistic gymnastics were sold to the public; I find this a surprisingly high percentage but that is what the figures say.  I have, however, noticed that for certain events, in certain price categories, the figure comes down to as low as 35%.  In other words, you might say, about two thirds of these tickets were given away to sponsors and dignitaries, presumably the top priced tickets for the premium finals, which might explain why there were so many empty seats visible on our TV screens, even towards the end of the competition. 

The, there are the unfathomables : for example, were rent-a-crowd counted as sold, or unsold? Are all these statistics strictly accurate? I remain convinced that there was an almighty balls-up in the initial ballot that left so many of us disappointed.  Ticketing will remain a thorn in the side of the London Olympic Games. 

I'm still very glad I managed to be there, though.

Comments

  1. That always seems to be a problem with Olympics - ticketing, they have all these so called important people getting special tickets and don't show up.

    Here is a new interview with Aliya...I think. After the New Year maybe you all could translate it.

    http://www.newizv.ru/sport/2012-12-28/175359-alija-mustafina.html

    Happy New Year when it comes

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tatyana Nabiyeva on work and love in China

Some highlights from a long interview with 2010 World champion Tatyana Nabiyeva.  Source: Russian team page on VK.com.  Translation - Google translate A big interview with Tatyana Nabieva about the peculiarities of work and life in China, the bright years of her sports career, a little about modern gymnastics and about love. On the Nabiyeva flight — At the same championship, you presented a new element on the bars, which was later added to the rules with your last name (flying over the top bar with a straight body, difficulty group F. — Sport24). How did you come up with the idea to try something new? — Actually, it happened spontaneously, I think. We worked with Vera Iosifovna [Kiryashova] on the purity of the elements on the bars, sometimes I didn’t fly all the way to the Shaposhnikova element. Once I didn’t fly all the way to the bars either and stood on my feet between the bars, bending my legs in flight for safety. Then Vera Iosifovna said that this was a different eleme...

Men's team results : Russian national championships

Full results are available here . In summary, 1    Moscow    (Olennikov, Garibov, Gogotov, Bondar, Stolyarov, Ablyazin)    261.55 2    Siberia       (Devyatovski, Pakhomenko, Ignatiev, Cherkasov, Golutsotskov  259.85 3   Central       (Barkalov, Nyudakin, Markelov, Perevoznikov, Bondar, Ignatenkov   255.00 Interesting - Mikhail Bondar appears to have competed for two teams simultaneously here - Moscow and Central - not sure how this works but quite pleased with myself for noticing it ;-)  Only his high bar score counted for the Central team.  One of the wonderful mysteries of Russian gymnastics.  Hopefully we'll have the women's team results later.  And perhaps I'll discover something even more wondrously mysterious there.  Who knows. 

Who needs difficulty? Portraits of a young gymnast - Ivan Stretovich

These pictures of young Ivan Stretovich, taken by Elena Mikhailova at last week's European Gymnastics Championships, are available in a gallery at the Russian Gymnastics Federation website.  I wanted to share a sequence of them with you. Stretovich turns 16 in October, and comes from Novosibirsk in Siberia, where he is coached at the Dynamo club by B Konvissar.  This young gymnast emerged at April's Russian Championships, where he took gold or silver medals in every event final except for vault.  In Montpelier, he contributed to the Russian team's silver medal. But pictures speak louder than words, and medals aren't all that matters.  Stretovich's start values (in qualifying 5 (F), 5.1 (PH), 4.8 (SR), 5.4 (V), 5.1 (PB) and 4.9 (HB) leave some room for development, but the special quality of his work is even rarer than a double twisting double back somersault.  That quality is the ability to elevate the simple to a pitch of perfection, and to make the diff...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more