Skip to main content

London 2012 ticketing report


The organising committee of the London Olympics (LOCOG) has finally published full details of ticketing at the Olympic Games, including how many were eventually sold to the public rather than given away to sponsors and dignitaries, and how many tickets were available in each price category.

Despite the fact that the public and press have been baying and begging for this information for most of the past year, LOCOG have chosen to publish their report as quietly as possible, without any accompanying press releases or events, and right upon the cusp of Christmas, at the same time as the UK media is sizzling with news stories left, right and centre.  Almost as though they would like to keep some of the facts as quiet as possible; after all, they have managed to convince us that the Games were an immense success.

Which, in the main, I agree with.  I don't want to say goodbye to 2012; the Olympics brought much happy spirit to the city of London and its people, and I don't think Londoners will ever be the same again.

That happy spirit wasn't about the ticketing, though.  While I was delighted to secure my one Olympic ticket, to the WAG qualifying, at 10.30 on the night before the competition (it was a lifelong ambition realised)  I was less pleased to see all the empty seats around me, knowing how many of my friends would have given an arm and a leg to be there if only they could have managed to navigate the many barriers that were put in their way and which made obtaining tickets far too difficult for the majority.  I have never before seen regiments of soldiers occupying whole sections of a gymnastics arena.  LOCOG does not mention its somewhat desperate rent a crowd efforts designed to make relatively empty arenas look full, and indeed we are now hearing about 'sell out' events.  This may be true of certain sports, but not of the gymnastics.  You just had to use your eyes to see this.

Of course, having all the data available isn't necessarily a good thing as it's rather indigestible and difficult to interpret.  I need some time to print out the key sections and read them properly, to avoid misrepresenting what is there.  There are some apparently simple data: overall, 59% of tickets for the artistic gymnastics were sold to the public; I find this a surprisingly high percentage but that is what the figures say.  I have, however, noticed that for certain events, in certain price categories, the figure comes down to as low as 35%.  In other words, you might say, about two thirds of these tickets were given away to sponsors and dignitaries, presumably the top priced tickets for the premium finals, which might explain why there were so many empty seats visible on our TV screens, even towards the end of the competition. 

The, there are the unfathomables : for example, were rent-a-crowd counted as sold, or unsold? Are all these statistics strictly accurate? I remain convinced that there was an almighty balls-up in the initial ballot that left so many of us disappointed.  Ticketing will remain a thorn in the side of the London Olympic Games. 

I'm still very glad I managed to be there, though.

Comments

  1. That always seems to be a problem with Olympics - ticketing, they have all these so called important people getting special tickets and don't show up.

    Here is a new interview with Aliya...I think. After the New Year maybe you all could translate it.

    http://www.newizv.ru/sport/2012-12-28/175359-alija-mustafina.html

    Happy New Year when it comes

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Head MAG Coach Alfosov on Russian gymnastics prospects in 2026

"A Really Good International Level": Alfosov on the Return of Russian Gymnasts, Belyavsky's Videos, and the Games Qualification Alfosov: Belyavsky's presence on the team was a big plus Interview by Elena Vaitsekhovskaya  Google translate Russian gymnasts competing under neutral status will be able to take their first step toward qualifying for the Los Angeles Olympics as early as October, Valery Alfosov, head coach of the Russian men's team, told RT. He believes that qualifying for not only the individual but also the team competition at the World Championships is one of the season's greatest achievements. He also explained the criteria he uses to compare his players with their competitors and described David Belyavsky's decision last year as hard-won. The current season began with good news for the gymnasts: almost all of the leading Russian team members are participating in international competitions. Does this mean the suspension situation is a thing of...

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Artistry versus acrobatics???

Watching videos of this weekend's competitions - the qualification and all around rounds of the Russian championships, medal winners from the American Cup - I am struck, more and more, by the huge difference between the American and Russian schools of gymnastics. It led me to ask the question : do artistry and acrobatics have to be mutually exclusive? (I am afraid that I think naming 'American' gymnastics a 'school' is perhaps lending an undeserved dignity to work which has become excessively obsessed with the difficult and the consistent, but I am using the word here so as not to label unfairly those individual gymnasts who are blameless in the direction of their training.) The FIG's vision for gymnastics is said to embrace more artistry; at least the publicity it has put about on the subject of its new Code makes that fairly plain.  So perhaps the Russians, with their inconsistent brilliance and superior body carriage (Mustafina, Komova, Grishina, Afanasy...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more