Skip to main content

2026 Russian Championships Performance Analysis WAG UB

 Part 2 – Women’s Uneven Bars: Difficulty Makes the Difference

Uneven bars produced some of the highest technical standards of the 2026 Russian Championships. The event featured the championship’s highest D scores in the women’s competition and rewarded gymnasts capable of combining complex release sequences and transitions with clean execution. Although several routines were closely matched for execution, difficulty ultimately proved decisive in separating the medal winners.  

The Podium

Medal

Gymnast

Region

Score

🥇 Gold

Lyudmila Arkadyevna Roshchina

Krasnodar Krai

14.633

ðŸ¥Ë† Silver

Anna Dmitriyevna Kalmykova

Moscow

14.300

🥉 Bronze

Leila Dmitriyevna Vasilyeva

Vladimir Region

14.266


Highest Difficulty Scores

Rank

Gymnast

Region

Best D

1

Lyudmila Arkadyevna Roshchina

Krasnodar Krai

6.5

2

Anna Dmitriyevna Kalmykova

Moscow

6.4

2=

Viktoria Viktorovna Listunova

Moscow

6.4

4

Leila Dmitriyevna Vasilyeva

Vladimir Region

6.2

4=

Zlata Sergeyevna Osokina

Leningrad Region

6.2


Highest Execution scores

Rank

Gymnast

Region

Best E

1

Anna Dmitriyevna Kalmykova

Moscow

8.233

2

Lyudmila Arkadyevna Roshchina

Krasnodar Krai

8.133

3

Irina Denisovna Komnova

Tula Region

8.100

3=

Leila Dmitriyevna Vasilyeva

Vladimir Region

8.100

5

Maria Alekseyevna Tretyakova

Moscow

8.233 (Team Final)


Team rankings

Rank

Team

Score

1

Moscow

55.366

2

Krasnodar Krai

51.666

3

Vladimir Region

51.499

4

Saint Petersburg

45.899

5

Tula Region

45.565



Numbers That Matter

14.633 — Highest women’s bars score of the championships.

6.5 — Highest start value achieved.

8.233 — Highest execution score recorded during the championships.

0.367 — Margin between first and third place.

Three gymnasts scored above 14.2, underlining the depth of quality at the top of the field.


Performance Spotlight

Lyudmila Arkadyevna Roshchina

Roshchina’s winning routine combined the championship’s highest difficulty with execution that remained among the very best in the field. Unlike some high-difficulty routines that relied on Difficulty alone, her performance was balanced across both components, leaving little opportunity for rivals to recover through cleaner execution. It was one of the clearest examples at these championships of a gymnast successfully pairing ambitious composition with secure performance.  


What We Learned

Uneven bars emerged as the apparatus on which difficulty most clearly separated the leading competitors. While execution scores among the medal contenders differed only modestly, the higher start values of the leading routines created decisive scoring advantages. The event also demonstrated the depth of Russian women’s bars work, with strong performances coming from several regions rather than a single dominant programme.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘My daughter likes gymnastics. For us, this is the big success’. Aliya Mustafina talks to Match TV

Via VK.com.  Google translate A big interview with Aliya Mustafina was published on MATCH!. We provide a small excerpt below, and the full version is available on the website at the link below  ❓ Aliya, you are now the head coach of the junior artistic gymnastics team. What does your typical day look like? 💜 My current life is similar to what it was when I was competing. In the morning, I have breakfast and go to work by 9:00, we train for four hours, have lunch, rest and train for another three hours. During the training camp, the athletes live at the base. They live and train on the same territory. ❓ Do you manage the gymnasts' personal trainers or do you evenly distribute the responsibilities? 💜 We work in contact with the personal trainers, I listen to their opinions. For example, if the trainer believes that their athlete needs to be given a little rest or do fewer repetitions of a particular exercise, we do so. ❓ Describe the current generation of children. Do they nee...

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Denial of visas - some background

Can I remind everyone interested in Russian gymnastics that the restrictions imposed on Russia following its state-sponsored doping scandal were quite separate from the restrictions introduced following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine? The Russian doping scandal came to prominence in 2016, while WADA imposed further sanctions in 2019. Although these sanctions restricted Russia’s participation under its national flag, they did not impose a blanket ban on Russian gymnasts. Athletes who met the relevant eligibility requirements were still permitted to compete. Artistic gymnastics has historically recorded relatively few positive doping tests, and Russian gymnasts were not collectively excluded from international competition as a consequence of the doping scandal. Russian gymnasts therefore continued to compete at the Olympic Games and major international championships, including the Tokyo Olympics in 2021. The situation changed in February 2022, following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukra...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more