Skip to main content

Why should the IOC have to make a decision?

With the European Championships taking place this week, there is one thing on my mind - gymnastics.  And the big question for me is - will Russia be able to take part in the Olympics?  It's looking increasingly unlikely - Europeans were the last chance to qualify as a team, and of course they aren't in Antalya this week. Russia has been invited to participate in the Asian Games, but this doesn't appear to be a valid route to qualification as a team, either.  The only chance may be for gymnasts to qualify individually - but with an FIG ban on all Russians at international competition, this looks unlikely, too.


We are all waiting for a decision from the IOC - can Russia be at the 2024 Olympics?  Yet it seems to me that this option has already been ruled out.  I get the impression that the four leading MAG in Russia - Nagorny, Dalaloyan, Ablyazin and Belyavski - have all but given up on the possibility.  Their demeanour seems almost to say, 'what kind of Olympics will it be without us?'.  


I agree.  A gymnastics competition without Russia is like beef without salt.    And since when did politics matter to sport?  I am old enough to remember South Africa's exclusion from the world of culture and sport - but that was because teams and audiences were segregated - you couldn't participate in sports without endorsing the very political policy - apartheid - that made South Africa so unwelcome in the international community.  There is no similar sporting discrimination in Russia, nor does supporting Russian sport make you a supporter of the war against Ukraine.  So why involve the IOC and the other sporting federations?  Their job is to make sports work, and to promote harmony between nations and people, not to make judgements about international politics.


And why pick on Russia?  Other countries have made aggressive interventions in places not their own.  For example, Britain got involved in Iraq not so very long ago; the USA was involved in a very controversial war with Vietnam.  Olympic exclusions were never suggested for these countries.  


You might say: sport is a state sponsored activity in Russia - you would be right, and President Putin does use it shamelessly to promote investment and interest in his country.  But don't we all?  I can't think of any leading country that doesn't have some level of state interest in its sporting machine, and that doesn't like to leverage sport in some way or another, as a way of promoting tourism, a way of disseminating national values.  And some of those state interventions have been incredibly undesirable - for example, the way that the FBI failed to investigate allegations of abuse in USA gymnastics.


So why even involve the IOC, the FIG, why even ask the question : 'should Russia participate in the Olympic Games?', in view of their unprovoked act of aggression against Ukraine.  Sports is surely a mechanism for the good; it promotes interest and friendship in other countries, exactly the kind of bonding that is needed in a time of war.  And the contumely that we are throwing at Russia at the moment is very one-sided, isn't it?


What do you think?  Please contribute an article if you would like to argue your point of view : send it to me at elizabethbooth136@btinternet.com.  

Comments

  1. Absolutely agree. I don't necessarily oppose a Russian ban in theory. But it would have to be applicable equally. And it's not. If it were the USA would be out - not just for Vietnam or Iraq but for literally hundreds of invasions, coups, and color revolutions. But they don't because its America and the people they do it to live in Asia and Africa and Latin America.

    The fact that Israel gets to compete anywhere is a scandal. So yeah. This is just Western politicking.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Svetlana Boginskaya: I was always a bitch* in gymnastics

Svetlana Boginskaya, 15 years old, with her medals from the Seoul Olympics Nico translates the latest interview with gymnastics legend Svetlana Boginskaya, during a recent visit to her home country of Belarus. Svetlana Boginskaya: I was always a bitch* in gymnastics, so now I ask for forgiveness from everyone who came in contact with me. The National Olympic Committee of Belarus held a press conference with three-time Olympic Champion in artistic gymnastics, Svetlana Boginskaya. The meeting was devoted to the 25th anniversary of the Olympic Games in Seoul. In South Korea the Belarussian won two gold medals in the team competition and vault. As a gift to the Olympic Hall of fame, the famous gymnast, now living in the United States, donated one of her trophies that she won at the 1990 European Championships and a pennant for Best Female Athlete of the USSR in 1989. How happy we were when we could share with such stars as Boginskaya, Scherbo, and Ivankov,...

Natalia Yurchenko - an exclusive interview

Natalia wins gold at the World Championships in Budapest, 1983 1983 World Champion Natalia Yurchenko speaks directly to readers of RRG in this exclusive interview.    Early years: In the summer of 1976, at the age of 11, I was accepted to a sports boarding school in Rostov-on-Don. I remember it was a 4-level building with the cafeteria on the first floor, academic classrooms on the second floor, rooms for girls on the third floor and rooms for boys on the fourth floor. There was one TV on the ground floor and the kids who stayed at school over the summer (about 20-30 kids), were able to watch the Olympics. Nadia Comaneciā€™s outstanding performance made us feel jealous because usually the Soviets were the unbeatable favorites. We did feel some relief with amazing performances from Nellie Kim and Ludmilla Tourischeva. Besides Ludmilla, there was a gymnast from Rostov-on-Don, Svetlana Grozdova! And, we were really thrilled to see the very little and cute Maria Fi...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more