Skip to main content

Is Sports Politics Threatening to Destroy Sport?

 Is Sports Politics Threatening to Destroy Sport?

4 November 2026

It isn’t just gymnastics that is being affected by visa refusals, political boycotts and disputes over Russia’s return to international competition. Ice hockey is now facing a crisis that threatens the organisation of some of its most important championships.

On 30 October, the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) ruled in favour of the Russian Ice Hockey Federation, overturning the International Ice Hockey Federation’s (IIHF) continued exclusion of Russian national teams. CAS found that the IIHF had not provided sufficient evidence to justify the exclusion on security grounds.

The IIHF has expressed disappointment with the ruling but has confirmed that it will comply. However, the decision has triggered a wave of opposition from national federations, governments and commercial sponsors.

Six European countries — Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Latvia and the Czech Republic — have announced that they will refuse to play against Russia at the 2027 World Championships.

Germany, which is due to host the championships, is now considering the implications for its role as organiser, including the possibility of relinquishing its hosting rights. Austria is also considering joining the opposition.

Meanwhile, Canada has announced that Russian and Belarusian national teams will not be permitted to participate in the World Junior Ice Hockey Championships, scheduled to begin in Alberta on 26 December. The Canadian government’s restrictions distinguish between athletes representing their countries and those competing individually under neutral status.

The dispute is spreading beyond the sporting authorities. Sponsors have threatened to withdraw their support, while some European governments are considering further visa restrictions.

Russian Sports Minister Mikhail Degtyarev has responded angrily, raising the prospect of legal challenges against those obstructing Russia’s return.

Where does all this end?

The European federations argue that Russia’s continuing war in Ukraine makes its participation unacceptable. Their position reflects genuine political, ethical and security concerns, which cannot simply be dismissed.

But there is another question that deserves serious consideration.

What happens to international sport when its governing bodies and arbitration mechanisms make decisions that national federations and governments refuse to implement?

How can international championships function when qualified teams are unable to obtain visas, when countries refuse to compete against one another, and when organisers are threatened with losing their events?

And what happens to the athletes, many of whom have devoted their lives to preparing for competitions that may never take place?

Sport has never existed entirely outside politics. But international sporting organisations were established to create opportunities for competition across national boundaries, even between countries whose governments profoundly disagree.

That principle is now under enormous strain.

We are witnessing an increasingly fragmented sporting world, in which the decisions of international governing bodies are being challenged by national political positions, and athletes are caught in the middle.

Whatever our views on Russia, Ukraine and the wider political conflict, we should be concerned about the consequences for international sport.

If countries can no longer compete against one another, if international rulings cannot be implemented, and if sporting championships become arenas for political confrontation, what future is there for sport as a means of bringing people together?

It looks to me as though sports politics is threatening to destroy the very thing it is supposed to protect.

Sport itself.

RRG / Elizabeth Booth


References

1. International Ice Hockey Federation, 30 October 2026
Official statement on the CAS ruling and its implications for Russian participation in international championships.

2. Financial Times, 4 November 2026
Six European nations threaten to boycott Russia in ice hockey world championships.
Reports the positions of Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Latvia and the Czech Republic, alongside the implications for Germany and tournament sponsors.

3. Euronews, 4 November 2026
Hockey nations refuse to play Russia as Germany weighs pulling out as host.
Details the European federations’ positions, possible visa restrictions and commercial consequences.

4. Reuters, 3 November 2026
Canada will bar Russians from competing at ice hockey tournament, says Carney.
Reports Canada’s decision concerning the World Junior Championships.

5. Deutsche Welle, 2 November 2026
IIHF considering options after CAS order to reinstate Russia.
Examines the legal ruling, the IIHF’s response and the difficulties of implementing Russia’s reinstatement.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Leonid Arkayev press allegations - a translation

Liubov Baladzhaeva has provided a good translation of the article from the Saransk and Mordovan Times .  Text in square brackets are Liubov's personal comments.   Leonid Arkayev was fired from the gymnastics center in Saransk that was named after him. It is not clear what was the real reason (or the host of reasons), but the authors speculate that the main issues were conflict over the state-owned apartment given to Arkayev and the lack of results from the athletes he trained. However, when the journalist went to investigate the situation she encountered rumors that Arkayev had a special interest in the female gymnasts. The author claims she was able to talk to some of the victims whose names she can’t reveal. First, the article talks about two issues with Arkayev as a coach that weren’t related to sexual harassment allegations. His former colleague, a gymnastics coach called Irina in this article (not sure if it’s her real name) talked about working with him. Accordin...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more