Skip to main content

Russian gymnasts to apply for neutral status

Gymnastics has lost some of its appeal over the past few years, whilst Russian athletes have been out of competition.  This might be an unpopular opinion, but it reflects the reality of international gymnastics without around a quarter of its leading protagonists.  The international competitive field has not raised its performance in the absence of Russia's leadership; gymnasts from the top ten or fifteen have floated upwards in the ranks to fill gaps in the medal placements, and we see mediocre performances gaining gold, silver and bronze medals.  Gymnastics has lost some of its imagination and vision without Russian athletes.

This doesn't detract from the efforts of the world's best gymnasts.  Gymnastics quite simply needs the special abilities of Russian athletes to provide competition for our international contenders and drive the sport to ever greater things.  In particular, artistry has been almost entirely lost without Russian athletes to provide a good example.

The world does not need war.  Russia's merciless destruction of Ukraine is a frightening picture of unprovoked aggression backed by a powerful state with little care for peace and harmony in the wider world.  Providing the Russian state with an international voice through the medium of sport seems wrong.  Punishing Russia's individual athletes for their state's cruelty seems equally wrong.  

Russia is not a state that tolerates dissidence.  Russia's athletes are in no place to speak out against the war without risking serious consequences.  Russia's sports institutions are historically bound to the state and to state organisations such as the Army (Mustafina, for example, trained at the Central Army Club in Moscow).  There is nothing Russia's gymnasts can do about that when they compete for their clubs from childhood and are assigned to their clubs at a very early age.

It's great news, however, to read that the RGF is supporting its individual athletes in applying for individual neutral status to be able to compete in international competition.  (I doubt that this reflects a national intention to pursue diplomacy in its relations with Ukraine; to imagine thus would be to conflate sport with international diplomatic relations.)   It will be two or more months until we hear the results of these applications, which presumably will be measured against the FIG Conditions of Participation for Individual Neutral Athletes.

I'm expecting Melnikova and Listunova to be amongst the first wave of Russian athletes to make their applications.  Both have been out of competition for around nine months, recovering from injury.  Most of their publicity is self-managed, through social media.  No risky press interviews, then, likely to press the athletes into tricky corners with questions about the war.  The walls of their gymnasia appear to have been painted in plain colours, without any embellishments that might count as political propaganda.  

I'm less sure of the status of Russia's male gymnasts.  I've heard contradictory reports of the likelihood of Dalaloyan making an application, although he seems to have managed to keep his powder dry and has avoided contact with the notion of the war.  Ditto Belyavski, although he seems more interested in his family than in gymnastics these days.  Nagorny, who appears on international sanctions lists, is surely out of eligibility, and won't even bother applying.

I don't know if any of the new, up and coming gymnasts will make their voices heard.  We have to keep our ears to the ground.

I'm not expecting Russia to rush back into the competitive arena in a blaze of glory, even if they are accepted into the international fold.  Gymnastics is not a sport that stands still, and without the impetus of international competition the Russian gymnasts will inevitably have lost some of their edge.  I hope though that we will have at least two Russian gymnasts competing in the World Championships next autumn, and possibly continuing to the next Olympic Games.  Gymnastics needs Russian athletes, and the IOC's decision making should not be designed to kill off the sport in Russia, especially when the sport has relied so much on Russia's leadership over the years.  The re-election of Russian officials to leading roles in the FIG recently only emphasises this.  For many, many years the gymnastics community in Russia has worked for other countries by convening international camps and disseminating technical and artistic knowledge and know how.  This dates back to the Soviet era and has only recently stopped as a result of the war.

Russian athletes have for so long given so much to make the sport great competitive entertainment, in a a spirit of friendship as much as rivallry.  They have been patient and faithful to the sport.  The FIG and the IOC should pay the athletes and coaches back by giving them the floor once more.  Surely it would be healthy to show the world that Russian people remain decent and normal, even if their state, for now, is betraying them.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Simone and the others - results and reflections

In the end, it was as predicted : Simone and the others, with Simone's teammate, Alexandra Raisman, providing the back up.  I do not need to point out that, by definition, the Americans are scoring significantly higher marks than the rest of the field.  Congratulations to them! Aliya Mustafina finished in third place.  The 2012 bronze medalist led the competition after vault and uneven bars, but had a very nervous outing on beam that might have taken a less experienced gymnast out of the medals.  A bravura performance on floor brought Aliya back though to confirm her third place all around.  From her senior debut in 2010 to today, Mustafina has continuously set high standards of grace.    It is the first time since 2000 that a gymnast (Amanar) has medalled in the all around at two consecutive Olympics, and  if Aliya can medal on Saturday's uneven bars final, she will once again be Russia's biggest medal winner of the women's gymnastics.  Russ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...