Skip to main content

The loneliness of the long distance blogger




I’m the one individual who has run this blog since 2009.  

Since 1972 I have followed the Soviet and Russian gymnasts through thick and thin. This has included times when virtually no information reached our ears to times when there has been so much information that my brain has felt like it’s exploding.  There have been times when I have had to step back and slow down, others when I have felt I am arguing a vicarious debate for the gymnasts, for example in 2016 when they were threatened with an unfair Olympic ban for doping.  

Sometimes I feel as though I don’t have the right to stop.


These days I’m constantly questioning the rights and wrongs and trying to find a fair way forward that gives readers what they want, me and others a chance to speak our truths, reflects the reality of the sport in Russia, and is respectful towards Ukraine and its suffering.  My blog is about gymnastics, not war, but in order to be critical I need to heed the context.  At present that context includes war.


Often I can’t be critical because it’s too difficult to navigate the grey area between different truths and outright lies (not from the gymnasts who I think almost always speak from their hearts, but bigger lies from supermassive states).  I monitor social media and the internet, and I use Google translate to try to get to the bottom of things that are happening - whether it’s Melnikova’s birthday party on a yacht, Marinov’s struggles with injury or the Russian Government’s decisions to favour digital sport over action on the apparatus.  


Often, I’m just recording what the coaches and gymnasts say - I feel this is important as a historical record, even though I do have to be selective.  And my selectivity will inevitably be flawed.  I’m not paid for doing this, nor do I speak fluent Russian.  It’s hard work even if I do love the gymnasts.  It often feels as though I can’t do enough.  


There are other very good blogs and internet sites who follow the history of the sport, but this is the one that focusses on Russia in all its good, bad, glory and failure.  This is the one that attempts to monitor the narrative of contemporary events in Russian gymnastics, to provide some snapshots that can eventually tell a story of the sport in Russia. 


I don’t talk about ‘facts’.  I can say that it’s recorded that Svetlana Khorkina won the World AA in 1997; that’s a fact in the FIG’s records.  But facts tend to be a bit flat and uninteresting.  It’s far more realistic and interesting to make contentions based on what’s accepted as fact.  That involves criticality, and makes the telling of history something that is compelling.


I’m fairly sure that after 72 years of being a world leader in the sport of artistic gymnastics, Russia is now leaving the stage, and it’s because of its state’s involvement in war.  We are at a turning point in the sport.  And the rights and wrongs are more difficult than ever to fathom.  Should I even be writing this blog at all?  Where does gymnastics end, and propaganda begin?  


The gymnasts are trapped in a destiny that most likely isn’t of their own choosing.  They didn’t ask to be born in Russia. Russia has always emphasised the military in its history as though it’s something to be proud of.  We think we don’t have that perspective, but the truth is that we see things through our own spectacles and no one else’s.  We don’t see the parades at the Cenotaph as military propaganda; we read them as remembrance.   We are lucky that we live in a state that gives us the freedom to talk about this, or even think about it.  Nikita Nagorny is a big show off who has turned to his country as a way of making his voice heard, but in our countries he would be a talk show host and a scout leader, not a propagandist for an authoritarian state.  As David Belyavski said, if he were asked to fight for Russia in the war against Ukraine, he would do so: what other choice would he have? 


We sit in our comfortable offices in the west and judge other people for what we call ‘their choices’.  But it’s easy for us to be big and brave.


I’m still the only one writing this blog, maintaining my Facebook page and updating my Twitter.  I have about 8000 followers on Facebook, and pictures and videos are still the most popular thing.  


Since 2009 I have collected 6 million reads on my Blogger blog, most of them before about 2016.  The internet has changed and blogs are less popular.  I write less than I used to, but probably write longer than most people are comfortable with.  


I still haven’t finished writing about gymnasts and gymnastics in Russia, and I don’t know if I ever will.  For as long as my brain is functioning I can’t stop thinking about it.  I hope you stay with me as my reader, and I hope you can comment from time to time.  I’m going to try to stick with this.  

Comments

  1. I really appreciate your writings, thank you very much for your hard work!

    Greetings from Spain :)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Aliya Mustafina - 'each medal is very special'

'I'm very happy that everything turned out well today  ... Each medal is very special.  The UK team made mistakes, so there was a wide margin [of victory]... But naturally, [what I did] is not enough for the Olympics.  I prepared well for beam and bars but I am not ready for floor, I stepped up to help the team. ... To be honest, I did not look at the scores [when asked how the team reacted to the 6.5 gap before the final apparatus].  Gelya (Melnikova) is a good girl, she did everything and did not falter ... Seda fell on quite a complex element.  There is more work to do, but everything else went well.' [About a protest taken by the coaches on her beam score]. 'I am used to my protests being rejected, everything is normal!' Via vk.com I n other news , the UEG has confirmed that Spiridonova will replace Melnikova in tomorrow's bars final. No reason is given, but it is generally considered that Dasha has a better chance of gold.  This decision also means tha...

Simone and the others - results and reflections

In the end, it was as predicted : Simone and the others, with Simone's teammate, Alexandra Raisman, providing the back up.  I do not need to point out that, by definition, the Americans are scoring significantly higher marks than the rest of the field.  Congratulations to them! Aliya Mustafina finished in third place.  The 2012 bronze medalist led the competition after vault and uneven bars, but had a very nervous outing on beam that might have taken a less experienced gymnast out of the medals.  A bravura performance on floor brought Aliya back though to confirm her third place all around.  From her senior debut in 2010 to today, Mustafina has continuously set high standards of grace.    It is the first time since 2000 that a gymnast (Amanar) has medalled in the all around at two consecutive Olympics, and  if Aliya can medal on Saturday's uneven bars final, she will once again be Russia's biggest medal winner of the women's gymnastics.  Russ...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more