Skip to main content

Russian gymnastics ... A few issues and questions

A popular figure ... Coach Anton Stolyar with the Russian team this week

Issues and questions still dog the Russian programme despite the optimistic feeling of Komova's return, the apparently rapid recovery of Afanasyeva and the early competition vigour of Mustafina.  By the end of the week, certain factors have been laid bare.  The injury to Grishina makes clear the fact that Russia still largely depends on its Olympians as medal prospects, and they are injury prone and below par currently.  Of the newcomers, only Kharenkova is showing the steel necessary at the very top level, and she is out of the ordinary in transitioning successfully to senior level.  Promising juniors such as Melnikova and Tutkhalyan are not uncommon in the Russian programme, but much less common is the consistency and discipline to raise junior talent to senior medals.  Where, for example, were Shelgunova and Kuzmina this week?

Some good work should be acknowledged.  Spiridinova and Rodionova have made significant progress on bars under the guidance of coach Anton Stolyar (who formerly led the Italian juniors to great things on this piece).  Stolyar appears to be a popular figure with the gymnasts, and regularly accompanies teams on overseas trips for the second level competitions.  Elfimov will no doubt shape Komova as beautifully as humanly possible; the two of them have become as much a compelling partnership as Khorkina and Pilkin once were.  Afanasyeva has the diligent and supportive Nazarova, one of the leading coaches of Russia's new era who regularly fosters new talent on the Russian team.  Kharenkova and experienced coach Olga Sagina (who formerly coached Produnova and Sidorova) appear to be joined at the hip.

But who is on Mustafina's side?  Raisa Ganina certainly supports her in competition and has been responsible for the Olympic Champion's progress on beam.  But Ganina was always a beam specialist and choreographer before Alexandrov's departure to Brazil.  Has Alexandrov left a gap in Mustafina's training regime that has yet to be filled?  Is the Olympic Champion getting all the support she needs?  

I remember a similar situation when Boguinskaia so tragically lost her coach after the 1988 Olympics; no single coach could ever appear to mentor Boguinskaia in quite the same way as Miromanova had.  So Boguinskaia seemed to benefit from the collective efforts of Alexandrov, Ostapenko and Kozeev, as well as a coach from her Minsk club.  This arrangement no doubt exploited the talents of each one to the full, as well as challenging the complex network of relationships between the gymnast and her coaches, and was dependent on strong management and a clear focus on competition goals and the gymnast's welfare.  

Are the strong working relationships, focus and goals of the Soviet team shared by today's  coaches?  National coach Grebyonkin, who as a bars specialist shaped the Russian team's success on this piece prior to and during 2012, was sporadically visible throughout the competition, showing his rather unshaven face for Mustafina's bars, Nabiyeva's vault and Spiridinova's beam. 

And, speaking as an incurable coach-watcher, what of the apparent growing popularity of Stolyar versus the ebbing visibility of Grebyonkin?  



Comments

  1. The Seniors have lost competitiveness. They seem not to be ready and they lack the will to win and to train new elements. Compare their routines to the gymnasts' performances in Tokyo yesterday! Such drabness!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Clearly, there is no leader for the Russian coaches. The Rodionenkos are playing hands off game here and dropping all the weight on coaches to figure out a way of making their gymnasts score 15s. What matters for the Roidionenks is claiming the credit and being in the media once a medal is scored, classic!. Giving the Rodionenkos lack of leadership skills, lack of strong technical knowledge and practice of coaching gymnastics, innovation and history of achievements, I dont see an optimistic future for the Russian program. Obviously, the Rodionenkos are doing this to stay in the safe zone where they can fire the coaches if no medals and claim the credit if any medals, nasty. Andrey Rodionenko never rings a bell in terms of glorious champions. Personally, all I could remember about him is ZERO medals in Beijing. As for Valentina Rodionenko, all I could remember is what Alexandrov said "she never coached a day in her life" and "the loose canon". In conclusion, for Russia, there seems like no plan, "just upgrade and they will come" :) and no leader to direct the ship. Alexandrov was the only leader of that team till VR and AR decided to play the leaders to be in front of the cameras. Catastrophic!

    Alfi

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who knows, I can't give a full impression until seeing them at the bigger events starting with Euros. I didn't really watch all the broadcast as yet, but I think I saw Grebyonkin there from time to time. I am not sure he is "head coach" material, who can really push the girls. He was really likeable as the bars coach, but does it mean he can be firm with them when needed like Alexandrov, or would they even listen when he is firm.

    Truthfully last year the Russian program succeeded because of Aliya working her but off last year when there were so many injuries. I would be more worried for that program when she does retire. I am not sure she is as close to her new coach as she was with Alexandrov, but I am sure she gets support from her. Hopefully there will be some juniors who can step up. There is still time, so I have faith.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi M

    Thanks for your comment. I really hope your perspective turn right. It is not like i want them to fail. Russian Gymnastics is a stand alone style and i'd love it to sustainably succeed but the dynamics of the Puppets Show played by Rodionenkos don't seem sustainable. Compared to the constant timely upgrades and improvements seen during Alexandrov days and compared to the American steady machine, i don't feel that optimistic. Valentia is no more than a media sales person whose statements are not necessarily true. The closer getting to any championship the more injuries witnessed. Personally, I have never witnessed this amount of injuries in any program other than the Russian. What does this tell us? These guys are not strategic and their coaches don't know what they are doing. There is no clear line of improvement. Let's hope for the better. We'll wait and see. I hope i am proven wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Me too.

    Re injury rates. I think the Russians are no worse than other top countries in this respect - USA, China and Romania all have their fair share of injuries. The problem for Russia is no strength in depth meaning that the same gymnasts continually take the lion's share of the strain, which makes it difficult for them to rest. Also quite frankly I find it rather sorry that Komova isn't raring to go competitively now and fighting fit after her very long break. The attitude in competition is markedly different between Mustafina and Afanasyeva and Komova.
    Secondly, I do not think Valentina is a very good shop window for Russian gymnastics, I just think she happens to be the one who takes up the slack in terms of press and PR and because of her personality says the wrong thing very often. I do not think she lies to the press about team composition, it is just that these things change over time naturally (this is in response to an earlier comment).
    I do think the coaches know what they are doing, they couldn't produce gymnasts of the quality of Komova, Afanasyeva, Mustafina, Kharenkova and Grishina if they didn't, but I agree that the whole team seems to lack direction, leadership and focus. Those gymnasts just named should be an Olympics gold medal winning team as they are collectively by far the most complete gymnastics team on the planet, and the FIG has to take some of its share of responsibility for the fact that they do nit have more gold medals from the past four years. This is demoralising.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Is gymnastics still artistic?

Such a lot is said about artistry these days - but you don't really see much evidence of it in the gymnastics.   There are flashing moments of brilliance that some people enjoy - for example, a gymnast like Brazil's Flavia Saraiva is a favourite for her spirited and expressive floor and beam.  Others might prefer the structured work of a gymnast like Kyla Ross.  For me, though, the idea of consummate artistry has been lost almost totally - the last time I saw anything like it was in 2012 when Komova performed her floor so brilliantly in the all around final.  But without a mechanism to reward artistry - something that is absent from this Code of Points - there really isn't much point even trying any more. Aliya Mustafina was interviewed recently while on holiday in Italy and expressed the opinion that artistry was something that was inborn, rather than trained.  She uses a metaphor to describe this - some gymnasts have five gears, not four, and the abilit...

UPDATE 23/9 - Russian WAG team for Nanning confirmed

Daria Spiridonova will compete at her first World Championships this autumn.  Picture : RGF Natalia Kalugina has confirmed the Russian team for Nanning : Aliya Mustafina, Maria Kharenkova, Tatiana Nabieva,Ekaterina Kramarenko, Alla Sosnitskaya, Daria Spiridonova.  Reserve : Polina Fyodorova Here is a paraphrased translation of a comment by Natalia Kalugina on her Facebook page : 'Aliya has confidence in competition and she is, kind of, a coach to this team.  In Europe she succeeded in this role and she has told the coaches that she even liked it. The main fighting force will be Kharenkova, Sosnitskaya and Spiridonova.  Accordingly, the strongest apparatus will be beam (Marina Bulashenko With God!).  The Chinese women, of course, have been known to win that apparatus, but if one falls, they all fall.   Alla Sosnitskaya could compete in the vault final, and - in theory - on the floor. On bars, of course, Russia will probably lose to the Chinese women, but the...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more