Skip to main content

The background - Russia's history of sporting sanctions


Russia’s sporting sanctions date back to 2015, when investigations into state-sponsored doping led to widespread bans across international competitions. The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) imposed restrictions that prevented Russian athletes from competing at the 2016 and 2020 Olympics under their national flag or anthem - with the exception of the gymnasts, whose sport is clean and free from doping.

Then, in 2022 Russia began a war with Ukraine that is continuing to today.  Sanctions were levied across all sectors of society, including individuals, corporations and - controversially - sport and culture.  In Olympic sport, the IOC (International Olympic Committee) decided that the decision to ban Russia from international competitions should be made by sporting federations, such as the FIG (Federation Internationale de Gymnastique).  Remnants of the sanctions dating back to the discovery of state doping were still in operation during the 2020/2021 Olympics, when Russia competed under the designation 'Russian Olympic Committee'.  These measures were intended to separate clean athletes from systemic violations while maintaining integrity in global sport.  But then after the War began, all Russians were banned from official international competitions from 2022.  Russia's absence was complete.

While a few athletes in others sports such as tennis and athletics competed under neutral designation, the situation in gymnastics was complicated by the sport's close relationship to the state.  Only recently did gymnasts begin to apply for and be conferred the status of AIN (Athlete Individuel Neutrale in the IOC language, French, which translates to Individual Neutral Athlete in English).  Angelina Melnikova was amongst the first neutral athletes from Russia to compete in World Championships in 2025, when she won the World Championships.

There have been hiccups.  At one stage, in 2025, having secured a working relationship that allowed their athletes to compete as neutral, the Russian state took a hasty decision to withdraw their athletes.  But this was soon overturned, and the gymnasts were allowed to compete again.  Some athletes did not qualify for neutral status, especially Nikita Nagorny, who has experienced significant financial and other sanctions because of his involvement with Russia's Youth Army, and his business links.  But there are few other examples of politics mixing with sport and in general it's clear that while the gymnasts are patriotic, they are not political.

The sanctions extended beyond the Olympic Games, affecting disciplines like gymnastics, athletics, and figure skating. Some of these sports are still heavily affected by the state doping and war sanctions.  Over time, however, compliance improvements and cooperation with international bodies is leading to gradual reinstatement. The World Gymnastics and European Gymnastics decisions mark one of the most significant steps toward full normalization of Russia’s sporting status since the original bans were introduced.

The lifting of sanctions represents more than administrative change—it’s a psychological turning point for Russian sport. The return of the flag and anthem restores a sense of identity and unity, motivating athletes to prove themselves through performance rather than politics. As preparations begin for upcoming European competitions, Russia’s gymnastics community stands poised to demonstrate resilience, discipline, and pride on the international stage.

A Key Distinction: Artistic Gymnastics and Olympic Participation

While many Russian sports faced sweeping restrictions in recent years, Russia’s artistic gymnasts maintained a reputation for strong anti‑doping compliance, and as a result -

Russian gymnasts were able to compete at the 2020/21 Olympics, albeit under neutral designations such as the ROC

Russia's qualification pathways to the 2028 Olympics remain intact, unlike sports that faced full suspension

Gymnastics was and is widely regarded as one of Russia’s cleanest and most rigorously monitored

This distinction shaped how gymnasts experienced the sanctions era: they were affected symbolically — losing the flag, anthem, and national identifiers — but they preserved continuity with their training cycles, and competitive expectations are now high.


It also helps explain why the lifting of European Gymnastics restrictions feels especially meaningful to them: it restores the final missing piece of normality — the right to compete as Russia, not just as athletes from Russia.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...

Nelli Kim - 'Russian gymnastics has closed in on itself' - Lupita translates

Lupita has translated this ITAR-TASS interview with Nelli Kim.  It's controversial, to say the least. Ed's note : much of the initial response to this interview - both here and in the wider gymternet -  has focussed on the detail of Kim's words and especially her comments about Viktoria Komova, and smiling.  But I think these have to be taken in context, and not too literally. Don't forget that just a day ago Andrei Rodionenko complained bitterly about the judging in Antwerp, calling Kim's behaviour 'aggressive'. Kim is responding to this here, and to the wider current context of Russian gymnastics.  What she is essentially saying to the Russian coach is 'get your own house in order, produce confident, disciplined, well trained gymnasts - stop complaining, do your job, and I will do mine.'   She goes about saying this in a somewhat long winded way and says some things along the way that seem contradictory, unfair, inappropriate even for th...

Pongo’s predictions for Russia MAG in Rotterdam

Pongo is my AI assistant.  Read here his calculations of who might make the best Russian MAG team at the World Championships in October.  Please do feel free to disagree audibly, in the comments and note that Pongo admits, even he makes mistakes.  I don’t generally write such statistical material, so this may be a one off. With apologies for any errors, mine entirely and I wrote the brief.   Yes. I’ve treated this as a genuine team-construction problem , rather than simply taking the six gymnasts with the highest AA scores. For the calculation I used the most recent strong competitive score available for each gymnast: the Spartakiad scores for Yakubov, Novikov and Kisel , and mainly European Championship team-final/final scores for Dukhno, Marinov, Zaika and Sieedin , supplemented by Russian Championship scores where a recent European score was not available. That matters because Dukhno and Marinov, for example, were substantially stronger in Zagreb than some earlier...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more