Skip to main content

Dmitri Andreev - we are building towards long term goals

Dmitri Andreev, Russia’s gymnastics leader now that Andrei Rodionenko has stepped into an advisory capacity, is a long standing national coach and well respected international judge.  Now, as gymnastics in Russia steps forward onto the international arena once more, (via its neutral athletes, coaches and officials), it’s up to Andreev and his team to support and structure the growth and development of gymnastics.  

Russia’s first big goal as neutral athletes is to qualify for the Olympics at the October World Championships.  Many of the gymnasts have limited experience on the big stage.  The necessary placements are therefore a big ask - especially emotionally and psychologically.   Here is how Andreev sees things working.

1. Transition Phase: Building Toward Major Goals

The Russian team is in a deliberate rebuilding and preparation phase. Early-season competitions like the Russian Cup serve more as evaluation tools than peak performances. The primary objective is the World Championships in Rotterdam, which double as Olympic qualifiers. Success there—specifically a top-three team finish—is the central target.


2. Controlled Preparation vs. Immediate Results

Athletes are following individualized and sometimes unconventional preparation plans:

  • Angelina Melnikova skipped international events to focus on a tailored training schedule.
  • Others, like Victoria Listunova and Milana Kayumova, had limitations due to eligibility or health.

This reflects a broader strategy: prioritize long-term readiness over short-term results.


3. Physical Limitations: Endurance and Conditioning

A key weakness identified is lack of functional endurance, especially evident in later stages of competition:

  • Athletes performed well initially but showed fatigue in finals.
  • The extended competition format (closer to international standards) exposed this gap.

Improving endurance is now critical, especially with new Olympic formats placing decisive events at the end.


4. Adaptation to International Standards

The team is adjusting to:

  • Longer competition formats
  • New rules and judging systems
  • Mixed team events, which require versatility across apparatuses

There is also a learning curve in handling international judging procedures and protest systems, where inexperience has caused confusion.


5. Technical Development and Difficulty Strategy

For the men’s team:

  • Difficulty levels were intentionally not pushed earlier due to lack of international competition and injury risk.
  • Now, routines are being upgraded to match global standards.

For the women’s team:

  • Execution (cleanliness of routines) has declined slightly.
  • Certain apparatuses (like beam) remain inconsistent and need focus.


6. Inconsistency and Competition readiness

The men’s high bar final—marked by multiple falls—symbolized:

  • Loss of competitive sharpness
  • Effects of long absence from international events
  • Psychological and rhythm-related challenges under pressure


7. Health Management and Athlete Preservation

Injuries and recovery are being handled cautiously:

  • Several athletes skipped competitions to avoid aggravating issues.
  • There is a clear emphasis on long-term athlete health over immediate participation.


8. Strategic Competition Planning

The competition calendar is being used selectively:

  • Some events are skipped to allow recovery.
  • Future appearances (e.g., Challenge Cups) will be used to test secondary athletes.
  • Training camps (like the upcoming one in Antalya) combine preparation with recovery.


9. Realistic Self-Assessment

Andreev expresses cautious satisfaction:

  • The team is progressing as expected.
  • There is no overreaction to early shortcomings.
  • The focus remains firmly on peaking at the right moment rather than early dominance.
10.  Team news

Milana Kaiumova will be back soon.  She has been suffering a muscle strain in her back.  Leila Vassilieva is still rehabbing her leg injury and is expected to be back in time for Europeans, even if she can’t compete on bars and beam only.


Overall Theme

The interview reflects a methodical, long-term approach: balancing athlete health, technical upgrades, and adaptation to evolving international demands, all aimed at achieving peak performance when it matters most—Olympic qualification.



Source: Sergey Lisin, Sport-Express, “Melnikova’s Preparation Was Fully Coordinated: Interview with Dmitry Andreev” (2026).
https://www.sport-express.net/artistic-gymnastics/reviews/dmitriy-andreev-intervyu-glavnogo-trenera-sbornoy-rossii-po-sportivnoy-gimnastike-o-nachale-sezona-2026-i-melnikovoy-2418696/

Portions of this summary were generated using ChatGPT, an AI language model by OpenAI, and then refined and verified by the author.



Comments

  1. Happily, some management In RG. Concerning WAG, big improvement in vault, even if execution is not on point. I don't know if Mustáfina is coaching beam. She was not in Sirius, apparently. But the girls are doing well on beam and floor.
    Glótova came back after a long injury. Andreev explained the absence of a few gymnasts, which is new. And a very good point about the lack of endurement.
    I hope he can do something about the TV commentators, who did worse than ever, talking nonsense all the time,
    Margarita

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...

Nelli Kim - 'Russian gymnastics has closed in on itself' - Lupita translates

Lupita has translated this ITAR-TASS interview with Nelli Kim.  It's controversial, to say the least. Ed's note : much of the initial response to this interview - both here and in the wider gymternet -  has focussed on the detail of Kim's words and especially her comments about Viktoria Komova, and smiling.  But I think these have to be taken in context, and not too literally. Don't forget that just a day ago Andrei Rodionenko complained bitterly about the judging in Antwerp, calling Kim's behaviour 'aggressive'. Kim is responding to this here, and to the wider current context of Russian gymnastics.  What she is essentially saying to the Russian coach is 'get your own house in order, produce confident, disciplined, well trained gymnasts - stop complaining, do your job, and I will do mine.'   She goes about saying this in a somewhat long winded way and says some things along the way that seem contradictory, unfair, inappropriate even for th...

Pongo’s predictions for Russia MAG in Rotterdam

Pongo is my AI assistant.  Read here his calculations of who might make the best Russian MAG team at the World Championships in October.  Please do feel free to disagree audibly, in the comments and note that Pongo admits, even he makes mistakes.  I don’t generally write such statistical material, so this may be a one off. With apologies for any errors, mine entirely and I wrote the brief.   Yes. I’ve treated this as a genuine team-construction problem , rather than simply taking the six gymnasts with the highest AA scores. For the calculation I used the most recent strong competitive score available for each gymnast: the Spartakiad scores for Yakubov, Novikov and Kisel , and mainly European Championship team-final/final scores for Dukhno, Marinov, Zaika and Sieedin , supplemented by Russian Championship scores where a recent European score was not available. That matters because Dukhno and Marinov, for example, were substantially stronger in Zagreb than some earlier...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more