Skip to main content

Valentina Rodionenko - beam mistakes were not psychological

Valentina Rodionenko during podium training.  Courtesy of the RGF

Allsport today interviewed the Russian head coach as Russia's women took their first steps in these World Championships.  Competing in the first subdivision, on the first day of the competition, qualifications 'didn't go badly', according to team captain Aliya Mustafina on her Twitter account.  She was right: apart from a hesitant presentation on beam, the team did about as well as could be expected, perhaps even exceeding expectations on vault and floor.  Now read on as Valentina responds to Maria Staroveva's questions directly after the first subdivision.

You can say that the girls have qualified normally,  said Valentina Rodionenko. Yes, mistakes were made. But there is nothing wrong with that. Our team took the lead. In three of the four rounds - floor exercise, vault and bars - our gymnasts have been great, they all showed what they are capable. But on the balance beam things went wrong. Almost all the athletes made mistakes and so the gymnasts didn't receive the marks they should have.  But I repeat: there is nothing wrong with that. In the final - and there is no reason to doubt that we will get there - everything starts again.

There isn't really an explanation for why we suffered errors on this apparatus.  Yes, the first girls did not experience too many problems. I should just say I don't think the problems were psychological. I think the girls just relaxed a bit before they performed their combinations on beam. They were ahead pf the second team with a margin of 13 points - and probably decided that it would be easy.

Let's see what will happen next. Today we have to meet with the team, we'll talk and figure out what happened. Especially we had counted on Masha Kharenkova on the balance beam, but she did not hit her exercise.   During the performance there were mistakes and the dismount was unsuccessful. Perhaps even Aliya Mustafina will not get to the finals on this apparatus.

At the moment it is very difficult to say anything specific. Tomorrow qualifications will be completed - then we can draw conclusions, make plans. The judging is an important question. Will the judges hold the line and judge the same way at the end of the second day as they did at the beginning of the first? They are only people, and a lot will depend on their work. Let's see ...

So far, Mustafina has the best result in the individual all-around and Sosnitskaya is second.  Sosnitskaya is first on vault and Mustafina on bars - but we'll have to see how things stand at the end.

It is very difficult to compete first ...  you can not even imagine how difficult it is to go out at 9 am. And now it's even more difficult - to sit and wait while all the qualifications go ahead. Again, I have no doubt that we are going to finish in the top eight teams. But on some apparatus, to break into the final eight will be much harder.



You will find live results at the FIG website.

Comments

  1. Hail Valentina, finally!

    She sounds like a Pro. To me qualifications went well, actually, better than expected. I really really want to see Kharenkova in the BB final. Replacing Mustafina by Kharenkova in BB EF is possibel. I mean, Mustafina, a world champion on BB, is guaranteed to hit in the finals but Kharenkova, if she hits, would definitely be golden. This should be a replica of 2011 scenario when Afan replaced Komova on floor and hit a golden routine. YET, it is the Glorious Mustafina vs. fresh Kharinkova, difficult decision.

    Alfi

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think quals went well, too.
      Kharenkova is well down in the beam scores - Russia would not be able to substitute her for Aliya, even if Aliya finishes in the top eight after all the remaining gymnasts have competed.
      But she still has team finals to vindicate herself - and as a young gymnast there will, hopefully, be plenty more opportunities to compete.

      Delete
    2. Yeah, the 2011 scenario was possible only because Afanasyeva had qualified ninth, and thus was the first alternate and the first in line when Komova pulled out though.

      I'm impressed though, a Valentina statement where she sounds completely sane the whole way through? Someone call a doctor, maybe she's come down with a fever that's affecting her brain. She said that the girls did well and mentioned their errors without throwing blame around, discussed judging issues also without blaming the judges, and didn't call anyone fat. Wow.

      Delete
  2. I was pleasantly surprised with Nabs performance. Did a sold UB; and other than her typical bent knee, her DTY was good. She also displayed a solid veteran leadership as she was the first to talk with Kharenkova after her fall on beam.

    Well done team performance with room to improve in finals, and a drive for redemption for Kharenkova.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Andreev to replace Rodionenko

Dmitry Andreev has replaced Andrei Rodionenko as head coach of the Russian national artistic gymnastics team. This was announced on his Telegram channel by the Russian Minister of Sports and head of the Russian Olympic Committee Mikhail Degtyarev. 💬"I signed an order to appoint Honored Coach of Russia Dmitry Andreev as head coach of the Russian national artistic gymnastics team," Degtyarev said. "He is a highly qualified specialist with modern views, but at the same time he will be able to ensure continuity and support for the rich traditions of the Russian school of artistic gymnastics. Since 2015, Andreev has been working as a senior coach for the preparation of the national team's reserve. As an international judge, Dmitry Valerievich has extensive experience working at major international tournaments and participated in four Olympics (2012-2024). Since 2010, he has headed the All-Russian Collegium of Judges. 👏I would like to thank Andrei Rodionenko for his work...

Who really won the WAG All Around?

You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  My, how I wish we could have seen a similar document for the Tokyo World Championships. I wonder if anyone can explain how, if the FIG's Code of Points is so objective and fair, it is possible to come up with two different results using two differ...

Russia defend team silver medal in Rio

It was an emotional performance and an emotional reaction at the end - but Russia is now second in the world in both MAG and WAG! The team did well, exploiting its strengths on bars and vault, and holding its own on beam.  Seda Tutkhalyan really showed her maturity and mettle with an almost perfect showing on beam and a solid, if not faultless, display on floor.  Maria Paseka did her best ever Amanar vault.  Aliya Mustafina ... was Mustafina.  Taking her fifth Olympic medal here, she scored over 60 in the AA.   The best work did come from the 2012 veterans, although Seda on beam and Daria on bars do have that special mark of Russian innovation and skill.  Angelina Melnikova looked perhaps a little overwhelmed at times - though I personally love her emotion - but this was only her first Olympics and I am certain she will be back for more.  Should she have had her personal coach on the floor with her?  It might have given her more assurance.  I...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more