Skip to main content

Can judging ever be objective? Part 1

Image
By
In my usual butterfly manner I am dipping in and out of matters somewhat haphazardly, without looking at individual areas in too much depth. This is partly because I lack concentration at the times I come to write this blog, but also because I tend to like to see a whole picture, even if slightly out of focus, rather than part of a picture in intense focus. Inter-relationships between different phenomena interest me more than single ideas. Also, my passion is for gymnastics and what lies behind its creative and expressive development, rather than a particular set of theories.

Gymnastics is not something I observe coldly from the outside; I live each new and old routine, and my judgement of them comes from within me, and is preceded and shaded by many previous experiences. I am an armchair admirer of the sport; my main gymnastic achievement ever was to execute a forward roll without breaking my neck, and yet my recollection of my ‘favourite’ routines is always tinged with emotion and memories that go beyond mere intellectual recollection. This can work in reverse, accidentally and suddenly, as well as when deliberately recalling the detail of a competition. So when I hear a particular piece of music, it can remind me of a floor exercise. Natalia Ilienko’s 1981 floor exercise regularly pops up when I am listening to Classic FM. Swallows diving over a swimming pool in Crete reminded me of Comaneci’s graceful Hecht dismount off bars at the Montreal Olympics. Gymnastics trips me up from time to time in my everyday life and appears in places it never should, but it is always a welcome visitor.

So my view of gymnastics is completely subjective and personal. When I see a routine I feel for the grace rather than recognise and evaluate it as something that has particular characteristics. I respond to the large and spectacular and invest performances with emotion. These feelings most probably do not match the way others perceive the routine, and many of the features of the performance that I will enjoy will be intangible. It is the involuntary, unplanned beauty of gymnastics as opposed to the deliberate artistry. The Code of Points tries to quantify both, but fails.

If my perceptions are wholly personal, influenced by a host of personal experiences unique to me, and something that comes from within myself, there must be significant problems involved in using my sensory evidence to assign creative value to work. Yet who is to say that my personal assessment is of more or less value than another’s? In acknowledging sport as art and accepting gymnastics as a sport within which both the artistic and aesthetic are important, do we not need to acknowledge the critical role of subjective judgement? Can judging ever be objective?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Remembering last summer - Nelli Kim, her judges and Viktoria Komova

By
In view of Nelli Kim's recent interview , Lupita and I thought it timely to revisit the performance of some of the WTC President's judges over past competitions ... this article from 27th August 2012 is reposted here, as a reminder. You will find a link to the FIG's newly published book of results at the Olympic Games here .  This year, they have broken down the judge's execution scores so you can see exactly how each judge evaluated the gymnasts' performances.  It makes for interesting reading - if only I had more time to analyse each judge's marking.  A skim reading already highlights multiple inconsistencies in individual judges' marks and makes you wonder why they bother with the jury at all. I have taken the time to look at the reference judges' scores for the top four in the women's all around.  The FIG explains here what their role is, and how they are selected.  I even used my calculator, which is a risky thing in my hands.  M...
42 comments
Read more

Nelli Kim - 'Russian gymnastics has closed in on itself' - Lupita translates

By
Lupita has translated this ITAR-TASS interview with Nelli Kim.  It's controversial, to say the least. Ed's note : much of the initial response to this interview - both here and in the wider gymternet -  has focussed on the detail of Kim's words and especially her comments about Viktoria Komova, and smiling.  But I think these have to be taken in context, and not too literally. Don't forget that just a day ago Andrei Rodionenko complained bitterly about the judging in Antwerp, calling Kim's behaviour 'aggressive'. Kim is responding to this here, and to the wider current context of Russian gymnastics.  What she is essentially saying to the Russian coach is 'get your own house in order, produce confident, disciplined, well trained gymnasts - stop complaining, do your job, and I will do mine.'   She goes about saying this in a somewhat long winded way and says some things along the way that seem contradictory, unfair, inappropriate even for th...
30 comments
Read more

Pongo’s predictions for Russia MAG in Rotterdam

By
Pongo is my AI assistant.  Read here his calculations of who might make the best Russian MAG team at the World Championships in October.  Please do feel free to disagree audibly, in the comments and note that Pongo admits, even he makes mistakes.  I don’t generally write such statistical material, so this may be a one off. With apologies for any errors, mine entirely and I wrote the brief.   Yes. I’ve treated this as a genuine team-construction problem , rather than simply taking the six gymnasts with the highest AA scores. For the calculation I used the most recent strong competitive score available for each gymnast: the Spartakiad scores for Yakubov, Novikov and Kisel , and mainly European Championship team-final/final scores for Dukhno, Marinov, Zaika and Sieedin , supplemented by Russian Championship scores where a recent European score was not available. That matters because Dukhno and Marinov, for example, were substantially stronger in Zagreb than some earlier...
Post a Comment
Read more

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more