Skip to main content

Shushunova versus Silivas


1988 Olympic all around champion Elena Shushunova and silver medallist Daniela Silivas on the podium in Seoul

In truth it was the last big showdown of women's Olympic artistic gymnastics.  For those of us watching at home in London on our TV screens, in the wee small hours (2 or 3 am by memory) of Friday September 23rd, a gymnastics drama unfurled.  The main actors in the play - talented Romanian, Daniela Silivas, and her fierce Soviet rival, Elena Shushunova.  Bit parts were played by the defending World Champion, Aurelia Dobre, only recently recovered from a serious knee injury, and the up and coming Godess of gymnastics, Svetlana Boguinskaia.  

At the Rotterdam World Championships barely a year before, all four gymnasts had seen an overturning of gymnastics' status quo as the deep and exciting Romanian team defeated the expected champions, the Soviet Union.  Despite Romania's dominance there, Silivas had been wounded as she fell short of gold in the all around, defeated by her younger compatriot, Dobre, and the defending World Champion, Shushunova.  Shushunova and the Soviet team were humiliated to take home only a silver in the team and a silver in the all around; Shushunova's golds on vault and floor were mere consolation prizes.  Boguinskaia was the only other Soviet woman to take a medal there, a bronze on beam.  A lot of hurt feelings oozed from the world's top gymnasts as they travelled home from Rotterdam.  Seoul would not be a grudge match, but it certainly was an opportunity for Silivas and Shushunova to re-assert their sporting worth.

Mental warfare?  An iconic image from the Seoul Olympic Games - Shushunova, left, meditates in preparation for her final piece.  Silivas, directly next to her, has finished her competition and relaxes.  

The Soviets went home, licked their wounds for a short while, then prepared and refreshed themselves for a fight with their strongest rivals for many a year.  'We'll roll right over them, like a tank', said Shushunova in an interview with news magazine Time shortly before the Games.  Her demeanour in the first days of the Games showed that the Soviet women meant business in Seoul.  Her attack, vigour and purpose was a case study of best practice in team leadership.  Interviewed after the Games, Shushunova emphasised that her main worry was that her team won back its winning position.  By the time she had made it to the all around final, she felt that her main job was already done.

Unsurprisingly, Shushunova, facially at least, looked exhausted in the all around competition that followed rapidly on the heels of the team final.   Two days of draining competition - compulsories, then optionals - had already taken their toll.  There had been medal ceremonies and media appearances.  In those days, consistency over all parts of the competition mattered.  Scores from the team competition were averaged out and carried forward to the all around final, and to the event finals.  At the beginning of the all around, Shushunova had a minuscule lead of .005 over Silivas, little enough of a cushion when a fall could mean a deduction of .5.  Shushunova had been faultless in the team competition, but Silivas had suffered a low landing on her first tumble - a double double - on optional floor.  Despite the narrow margin, this early mistake really counted, but Shushunova would still need to compete without error if she was to win the gold.

The competition between these two gymnasts is often depicted as one of grace (Silivas) versus power (Shushunova), but this is an oversimplification.  Silivas certainly had the more accessible style of artistry, an easy smile that drew the audience to her.  In comparison, Shushunova looked severe, until she let loose with that smile of victory that spread all over her face.  Silivas had a lovely airy, gravity-defying feel to all her gymnastics, while Shushunova's acrobatics were mighty explosions that rocketed sky-high.  Both gymnasts were equal when it came to line, grace and choreography.  Shushunova found her artistry in expressive dance on the floor, innovative technique on all four apparatus, and virtuoso performances of ultra difficult acrobatics.  (She had skills named after her in the Code of Points on every piece of apparatus.). Silivas' artistry came from a softness in her line, a spontaneity and speed in her movement, and crowd appealing gimmicks on the floor.  

In the end, in Seoul, the medal was determined by a mere whisper of a difference - .025 - in Shushunova's favour.  The tiny difference was down to human error.  Shushunova seemed almost super human at these Games, barely giving the judges a breath at deductions, most notably in a hop on her landing off uneven bars, and the tiniest whim of a wobble in beam.  Silivas, meantime, gave away that floor flub in team optionals as well as two beam teeters.  It really was as close as that.  For many who never saw the competition in its entirety, the final vault was the deciding moment.  It was indeed a thrilling end to three days of competition, but in reality, as it turned out, Silivas had lost it on the floor on the first day.  Silivas did have a better day in event finals, winning 3 out of 4 golds, but a major world all around gold proved to be forever out of her reach.

The selection of the USSR team in Seoul wasn't without controversy as Shushunova's co-World Champion from 1985, Oksana Omelianchik, was demoted to travelling reserve.  This will forever be a point of contention for all those who considered Omelianchik to merit selection on the basis of her past victories and the unique quality of her gymnastics.  Let Oksana have the final word on this classic competition.  'In Seoul, Elena could do everything', she said in an interview after the Games. You can hear her at the very end of Shushunova's all around competition - those cries of joy at the stuck landing came from Omelianchik.

Results of the 1988 Olympic Games WAG competition

BBC Barry Davies' reflections on Shushunova versus Silivas

Silivas floor, team optionals

Shushunova floor, team optionals

Silivas beam, AA

Shushunova beam AA

Women's AA final

Comments

  1. Oksana, a class act as always!

    OMG poor Daniela, that HAIR. I know they were trying to age her up but couldn't they have tried for a more flattering look?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Considering that it was the 80's, a more flattering look was simply impossible.

      Delete
    2. Oskana was Elena Shushunova's best friend and really acted like one. She was such an example of sportsmanship and grace in defeat at not being chosen.
      As for the hair, East German hair was the most 80s and most embarrassing.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Viktoria Komova - back pain has forced me to step down

I awoke this morning to a very simple statement from Viktoria Komova, on her vk.com site, which Papa Liukin has translated (via the IG forum): 'Dear friends, fans, and gymnastics lovers. Unfortunately back pain isn't allowing me to train to my full potential and get ready for competitions. I've made the very difficult decision to stop training and take care of my health. I want to thank everyone for their support! Without your love and warmth it would've been more difficult to go all the way. Thanks everyone and see you soon! Love and kisses.' Well, first of all, good wishes and best of luck to Viktoria, who has struggled since 2012 to re-establish herself fully as a competitive gymnast, whose talent was so great that she secured gold on bars at two different World Championships, four years apart, whose career was littered with controversy, who must be allowed to live her life as she wishes.   I know that the 'gymternet' will now be overflowing...

Fact or fiction? The press, gymnastics and pregnancy doping

It was a Sunday morning.  I was drinking my coffee and contemplating the day ahead - a workout at the gym, shopping for groceries, an evening reading a book, or catching up on last night's episodes of crime thriller The Bridge .  How nice it was not to have to think about work for a day. Then I saw it - a story about the history of doping in The Observer .  Interesting reading. Of course, cheating is as old as the hills.  It is, unfortunately, human nature for some people to try to gain easy advantage in any kind of competition.  That is why we have laws, rules, ethical guidelines.  People who cheat should face justice and shouldn't complain when they are found out. But the story about pregnancy doping bothered me.  Hadn't that been found to be fictional?  The author began with Olga Kovalenko's allegations made in 1994 - but the rumours had started way back in 1991 with the documentary series More Than A Game .  The practice...

Komova should have won!

It was a very tight battle in the North Greenwich arena today, with American Gabby Douglas beating out Viktoria Komova by a mere 0.259 points (see results below) and the legendary Aliya Mustafina sealing her comeback from that career-threatening injury with a well deserved bronze medal. Yes, she suffered a fall from beam after her Arabian somersault but elsewhere she was at her best, a real endorsement of the work of the Russian coaches in nursing her back to almost-top form since that fateful day in 2011. Komova had a faultless competition apart from a step on landing her Amanar vault. Frankly, she must feel utterly shattered after coming second once again by a very small margin to an American who was treated very generously by the judges. Komova soared and took every beam move to the max, rounding off with her rare double Arabian dismount in fine style; Douglas literally sidled along the beam, seeming frightened to take her feet off the apparatus for all but her somersaults. Kom...

RRG Archive - scroll by date, from 2024 to 2010

Show more